Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221486›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2020

Long term impact of powered toothbrush on oral health.

Wayne Richards, Anne-Marie Coll, Teresa Filipponi

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wayne RichardsUniversity of South Wales, Wales, UK.
Anne-Marie CollUniversity of South Wales, Wales, UK.
Teresa FilipponiUniversity of South Wales, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP).Data extraction and synthesis Data were taken from SHIP1 to SHIP3 over an 11 year period. Mixed-effects linear regression models were constructed between the exposure (manual versus powered toothbrush) and outcome variables (probing depths [PD], clinical attachment loss [CAL], caries status DMFS and DFS, tooth loss) adjusting for potential baseline covariates.Results Power toothbrush usage was found to be significantly associated with reduced mean PD and CAL progression scores, for example after 11 years the entire sample showed MTB users to have 0.41 mm PD mean progression while PTB users had 0.09 mm mean PD progression. This demonstrates PTB users having 0.32 mm less PD progression. Similar trends were shown for CAL mean scores.Conclusions There are benefits of power toothbrush usage and long term protective effects on oral health in terms of reduced probing depths, clinical attachments and number of teeth lost.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueGingivitisCohort StudiesDental Plaque IndexHumansOral Health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.