Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221474›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2021

Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research. Neonatal encephalopathy clinical trials: developing the future.

Kristen L Benninger, Terrie E Inder, Amy M Goodman, C Michael Cotten, Douglas R Nordli, Tushar A Shah, James C Slaughter, Nathalie L Maitre

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Biomarkers and neuromonitoring for prognosis of development after perinatal brain damage].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Blood gas measures as predictors for neonatal encephalopathy severity.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen L BenningerDivision of Neonatology and Center for Perinatal Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. Kristen.Benninger@nationwidechildrens.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-2737
Terrie E InderDepartment of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amy M GoodmanDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
C Michael CottenDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Douglas R NordliSection of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tushar A ShahDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
James C SlaughterDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Nathalie L MaitreDivision of Neonatology and Center for Perinatal Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Chicago · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Early Childhood Constraint Therapy for Sensory/Motor Impairment in Cerebral PalsyR01HD081120 · NICHD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI MAITRE, NATHALIE · 2015 to 2025
$5.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The next phase of clinical trials in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) focuses on hypothermia adjuvant therapies targeting alternative recovery mechanisms during the process of hypoxic brain injury. Identifying infants eligible for neuroprotective therapies begins with the clinical detection of brain injury and classification of severity. Combining a variety of biomarkers (serum, clinical exam, EEG, movement patterns) with innovative clinical trial design and analyses will help target infants with the most appropriate and timely treatments. The timing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR spectroscopy after NE both assists in identifying the acute perinatal nature of the injury (days 3-7) and evaluates the full extent and evolution of the injury (days 10-21). Early, intermediate outcome of neuroprotective interventions may be best defined by the 21-day neuroimaging, with recognition that the full neurodevelopmental trajectory is not yet defined. An initial evaluation of each new therapy at this time point may allow higher-throughput selection of promising therapies for more extensive investigation. Functional recovery can be assessed using a trajectory of neurodevelopmental evaluations targeted to a prespecified and mechanistically derived hypothesis of drug action. As precision medicine revolutionizes healthcare, it should also include the redesign of NE clinical trials to allow safe, efficient, and targeted therapeutics. IMPACT: As precision medicine revolutionizes healthcare, it should also include the redesign of NE clinical trials to allow faster development of safe, effective, and targeted therapeutics. This article provides a multidisciplinary perspective on the future of clinical trials in NE; novel trial design; study management and oversight; biostatistical methods; and a combination of serum, imaging, and neurodevelopmental biomarkers can advance the field and improve outcomes for infants affected by NE. Innovative clinical trial designs, new intermediate trial end points, and a trajectory of neurodevelopmental evaluations targeted to a prespecified and mechanistically derived hypothesis of drug action can help address common challenges in NE clinical trials and allow for faster selection and validation of promising therapies for more extensive investigation.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicBiomarkersBiomedical ResearchBrain DiseasesConsensusDelphi TechniqueDiffusion of InnovationForecastingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesNeonatologyNeuroimagingResearch DesignSocieties, MedicalSocieties, ScientificBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32221474
PMCPMC7529683
OpenAlexW3012983955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.