Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221451›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2020

Towards a biopsychosocial approach in dentistry: the Montreal-Toulouse Model.

Christophe Bedos, Nareg Apelian, Jean-Noel Vergnes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christophe BedosOral Health & Society Division, Faculty of dentistry, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada. christophe.bedos1@mcgill.ca.
Nareg ApelianCentre Dentaire Jean Talon, 524 Jean Talon W. Suite 1, Montreal, Quebec, H3N 1R5, Canada.
Jean-Noel VergnesOral Health & Society Division, Faculty of dentistry, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UFR Odontologie de Toulouse / Toulouse Hospital, 3 chemin des maraîchers, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biomedical model has been severely criticised in the last decades and its dominance challenged. This is why the concept of person-centred dentistry has penetrated the professional discourse and become a growing concern for our profession. Furthermore, dentists have been urged to take patients' environment more into account and to tackle the social determinants of their health, illness and access to care. Unfortunately, dentists still poorly comprehend person-centredness and social dentistry, and face difficulties to implement biopsychosocial approaches. To respond to these issues, we propose the Montreal-Toulouse Biopsychosocial Model for dentistry, which encompasses patient-centredness and social dentistry. Our model presents three types of tasks (understanding, decision-making and intervening) that dentists should take in each of three overlapping levels (individual, community and society). We also propose a 'Q-List', an original tool designed to help dental professionals adopting this model and reflecting upon their actions. This Q-List includes key questions to elicit dentists' reflexiveness and to support their biopsychosocial practice of dentistry. We invite dental professionals to adopt biopsychosocial approaches and use the Montreal-Toulouse Model as a guide. We also encourage them to use our Q-List and adapt it to their context of practice.

Indexed as

DentistryDentistsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.