ArticleScientific reports2020
Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Speaking rate normalization with and without spatial segregation of simultaneous context sentences.JASA express letters · 2026Article
- Is rate-dependent perception affected by linguistic information about the intended syllable rate?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Statistical learning at a virtual cocktail party.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- The effects of variability on context effects and psychometric function slopes in speaking rate normalizationa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Impaired perceptual phonetic plasticity in Parkinson's disease.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Using fuzzy string matching for automated assessment of listener transcripts in speech intelligibility studies.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
- Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two fundamental properties of perception are selective attention and perceptual contrast, but how these two processes interact remains unknown. Does an attended stimulus history exert a larger contrastive influence on the perception of a following target than unattended stimuli? Dutch listeners categorized target sounds with a reduced prefix "ge-" marking tense (e.g., ambiguous between gegaan-gaan "gone-go"). In 'single talker' Experiments 1-2, participants perceived the reduced syllable (reporting gegaan) when the target was heard after a fast sentence, but not after a slow sentence (reporting gaan). In 'selective attention' Experiments 3-5, participants listened to two simultaneous sentences from two different talkers, followed by the same target sounds, with instructions to attend only one of the two talkers. Critically, the speech rates of attended and unattended talkers were found to equally influence target perception - even when participants could watch the attended talker speak. In fact, participants' target perception in 'selective attention' Experiments 3-5 did not differ from participants who were explicitly instructed to divide their attention equally across the two talkers (Experiment 6). This suggests that contrast effects of speech rate are immune to selective attention, largely operating prior to attentional stream segregation in the auditory processing hierarchy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.