Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221336›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Decoding of Pain Perception using EEG Signals for a Real-Time Reflex System in Prostheses: A Case Study.

Zied Tayeb, Rohit Bose, Andrei Dragomir, Luke E Osborn, Nitish V Thakor, Gordon Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relation between heart rate variability and spectral analysis of electroencephalogram in chronic neuropathic pain patients.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Brain-Computer Interface to Deliver Individualized Multisensory Intervention for Neuropathic Pain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Detecting acute pain signals from human EEG.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zied TayebInstitute for Cognitive Systems, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Germany. zied.tayeb@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3257-0211
Rohit BoseN.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, 28 Medical Dr. 05-COR, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
Andrei DragomirN.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, 28 Medical Dr. 05-COR, Singapore, 117456, Singapore.
Luke E OsbornDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Nitish V ThakorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Gordon ChengInstitute for Cognitive Systems, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-8717
Fraunhofer Institute for Cognitive Systems · DEJohns Hopkins University · USNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent times, we have witnessed a push towards restoring sensory perception to upper-limb amputees, which includes the whole spectrum from gentle touch to noxious stimuli. These are essential components for body protection as well as for restoring the sense of embodiment. Notwithstanding the considerable advances that have been made in designing suitable sensors and restoring tactile perceptions, pain perception dynamics and its decoding using effective bio-markers, are still not fully understood. Here, using electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, we identified and validated a spatio-temporal signature of brain activity during innocuous, moderately more intense, and noxious stimulation of an amputee's phantom limb using transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS). Based on the spatio-temporal EEG features, we developed a system for detecting pain perception and reaction in the brain, which successfully classified three different stimulation conditions with a test accuracy of 94.66%, and we investigated the cortical activity in response to sensory stimuli in these conditions. Our findings suggest that the noxious stimulation activates the pre-motor cortex with the highest activation shown in the central cortex (Cz electrode) between 450 ms and 750 ms post-stimulation, whereas the highest activation for the moderately intense stimulation was found in the parietal lobe (P2, P4, and P6 electrodes). Further, we localized the cortical sources and observed early strong activation of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) corresponding to the noxious stimulus condition. Moreover, activation of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was observed during the noxious sensation. Overall, although this is a single case study, this work presents a novel approach and a first attempt to analyze and classify neural activity when restoring sensory perception to amputees, which could chart a route ahead for designing a real-time pain reaction system in upper-limb prostheses.

Identifiers

PMID32221336
PMCPMC7101312
OpenAlexW3013662736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.