Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221017›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without local therapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a DeCOG* study in 380 patients.

Teresa Amaral, Felix Kiecker, Sarah Schaefer, Henner Stege, Katharina Kaehler, Patrick Terheyden, Anja Gesierich, Ralf Gutzmer, Sebastian Haferkamp, Jochen Uttikal and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Predictive Performance of Serum S100BFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Teresa AmaralCenter for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tubingen, Germany teresa.amaral@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2516-5181
Felix KieckerSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah SchaeferSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Henner StegeDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Katharina KaehlerSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Patrick TerheydenSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Anja GesierichDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Ralf GutzmerSkin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Jochen UttikalSkin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Carola BerkingDepartment of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.
David Rafei-ShamsabadiSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical Centre University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-3199
Lydia ReinhardtSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Friedegund MeierSkin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ante KaroglanDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian PoschDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Thilo GambichlerSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Claudia PfoehlerDepartment of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Kai ThomsDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Julia TietzeDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Augsburg Medical Center, Augsburg, Germany.
Dirk DebusSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Rudolf HerbstHELIOS Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Steffen EmmertClinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Carmen LoquaiDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jessica C HasselSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank MeissSkin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical Centre University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas TuetingDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Vanessa HeinrichClinic of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Thomas EigentlerCenter for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Claus GarbeCenter for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Lisa ZimmerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
*German Dermatological Cooperative Oncology Group
University of Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHelios Klinikum Erfurt · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENuremberg Hospital · DERuhr University Bochum · DESaarland University · DESigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · ATUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNivolumab combined with ipilimumab have shown activity in melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). However, in most of the clinical trials investigating immunotherapy in this subgroup, patients with symptomatic MBM and/or prior local brain radiotherapy were excluded. We studied the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab alone or in combination with local therapies regardless of treatment line in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic MBM.

methodsPatients with MBM treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 23 German Skin Cancer Centers between April 2015 and October 2018 were investigated. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimator and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors associated with OS.

resultsThree hundred and eighty patients were included in this study and 31% had symptomatic MBM (60/193 with data available) at the time of start nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The median follow-up was 18 months and the 2 years and 3 years OS rates were 41% and 30%, respectively. We identified the following independently significant prognostic factors for OS: elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase and protein S100B levels, number of MBM and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. In these patients treated with checkpoint inhibition first-line or later, in the subgroup of patients with BRAFV600-mutated melanoma we found no differences in terms of OS when receiving first-line either BRAF and MEK inhibitors or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (p=0.085). In BRAF wild-type patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line or later there was also no difference in OS (p=0.996). Local therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery or surgery led to an improvement in OS compared with not receiving local therapy (p=0.009), regardless of the timepoint of the local therapy. Receiving combined immunotherapy for MBM in first-line or at a later time point made no difference in terms of OS in this study population (p=0.119).

conclusionImmunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, particularly in combination with stereotactic radiosurgery or surgery improves OS in asymptomatic and symptomatic MBM.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateIpilimumabNivolumabimmunologyoncologyradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID32221017
PMCPMC7206917
OpenAlexW3013320481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.