ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020
Whole Genome Sequences of 23 Species from the
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Phylogenomic Analysis Reveals Evolutionary Relationships of Tropical Drosophilidae: FromEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Evolutionary diversification reveals distinct somatic versus germline cytoskeletal functions of the Arp2 branched actin nucleator protein.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Dissecting the evolutionary role of theScience advances · 2021Article
- Article
- A phylogeny for the Drosophila montium species group: A model clade for comparative analyses.Molecular phylogenetics and evolution · 2021Article
- Conservation of gene architecture and domains amidst sequence divergence in theJournal of genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Large groups of species with well-defined phylogenies are excellent systems for testing evolutionary hypotheses. In this paper, we describe the creation of a comparative genomic resource consisting of 23 genomes from the species-rich
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.