Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32220938›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2021

Valuing hospital investments in nursing: multistate matched-cohort study of surgical patients.

Karen B Lasater, Matthew McHugh, Paul R Rosenbaum, Linda H Aiken, Herbert Smith, Joseph G Reiter, Bijan A Niknam, Alexander S Hill, Lauren L Hochman, Siddharth Jain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regulatory landscape for pediatric hematology-oncology nursing in Brazil: document analysis of policies and regulations.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Improving Nurses' Education Level in the Context of In-Hospital Mortality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. A Brief Theory Critique: The Theory of Moral Reckoning.Journal of nursing doctoral students scholarship · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen B LasaterSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA karenbl@nursing.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5834-1954
Matthew McHughSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paul R RosenbaumThe Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Linda H AikenSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Herbert SmithSchool of Nursing, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joseph G ReiterCenter for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bijan A NiknamCenter for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alexander S HillCenter for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lauren L HochmanCenter for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Siddharth JainThe Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeffrey H SilberCenter for Outcomes Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

STATISTICAL DATA ENCLAVE COREP30AG012836 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COE, NORMA B, KOHLER, HANS-PETER · 1999 to 2024
$14.0M
The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
Outcomes of Nurse Practice EnvironmentsR01NR004513 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AIKEN, LINDA H · 1997 to 2012
$5.9M
Sci-Tech Core-Population Dynamics Research CenterP2CHD044964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EMILIO ALBERTO PARRADO · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
Comparing Quality and Cost of Care Across Nursing EnvironmentsR01NR016019 · NINR · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MCHUGH, MATTHEW D., SILBER, JEFFREY H · 2016 to 2018
$1.8M
Hospital Care Environment, Neighborhood, and Racial Disparities in Elder OutcomesR01AG041099 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCHUGH, MATTHEW D. · 2011 to 2020
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012836NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041099NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD044964NINR NIH HHS R01 NR004513NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are known clinical benefits associated with investments in nursing. Less is known about their value.

aimsTo compare surgical patient outcomes and costs in hospitals with better versus worse nursing resources and to determine if value differs across these hospitals for patients with different mortality risks.

methodsRetrospective matched-cohort design of patient outcomes at hospitals with better versus worse nursing resources, defined by patient-to-nurse ratios, skill mix, proportions of bachelors-degree nurses and nurse work environments. The sample included 62 715 pairs of surgical patients in 76 better nursing resourced hospitals and 230 worse nursing resourced hospitals from 2013 to 2015. Patients were exactly matched on principal procedures and their hospital's size category, teaching and technology status, and were closely matched on comorbidities and other risk factors.

resultsPatients in hospitals with better nursing resources had lower 30-day mortality: 2.7% vs 3.1% (p<0.001), lower failure-to-rescue: 5.4% vs 6.2% (p<0.001), lower readmissions: 12.6% vs 13.5% (p<0.001), shorter lengths of stay: 4.70 days vs 4.76 days (p<0.001), more intensive care unit admissions: 17.2% vs 15.4% (p<0.001) and marginally higher nurse-adjusted costs (which account for the costs of better nursing resources): $20 096 vs $19 358 (p<0.001), as compared with patients in worse nursing resourced hospitals. The nurse-adjusted cost associated with a 1% improvement in mortality at better nursing hospitals was $2035. Patients with the highest mortality risk realised the greatest value from nursing resources.

conclusionHospitals with better nursing resources provided better clinical outcomes for surgical patients at a small additional cost. Generally, the sicker the patient, the greater the value at better nursing resourced hospitals.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesWorkplacehealth services researchnursespatient safety

Identifiers

PMID32220938
PMCPMC7530638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.