Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32220915›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Exploration of stress management interventions to address psychological stress in stroke survivors: a protocol for a scoping review.

Madeleine Hinwood, Marina Ilicic, Prajwal Gyawali, Murielle Gabriela Kluge, Kirsten Coupland, Angela Smith, Michael Nilsson, Frederick Rohan Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychological Stress Management and Stress Reduction Strategies for Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote, Asynchronous, Stroke-Tailored Mindfulness Intervention for Stroke Survivors and Support Persons.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madeleine HinwoodSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia Madeleine.Hinwood@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2225-973X
Marina IlicicHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Prajwal GyawaliHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Murielle Gabriela KlugeHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Kirsten CouplandHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Angela SmithHNEHealth Libraries, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael NilssonHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Frederick Rohan WalkerHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUStockholm County Council · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral studies have shown that stroke survivors report experiencing high and unremitting levels of stress, which can negatively affect brain repair processes and psychological outcomes and thereby compromise recovery. However, it is presently unclear which interventions have been trialled to manage stress in stroke survivors and whether they translate to clinically relevant outcomes. The aim of this scoping review will be to examine stress management interventions in stroke survivors in order to map the types of interventions trialled, commonly reported stress outcome measures and whether a reduction in stress contributes to reductions in relevant clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The methodological framework described in Arksey and O'Malley will be applied to this review. A draft search strategy was developed in collaboration with an experienced senior health research librarian. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library, PsycInfo and Clinicaltrials.gov as well as hand searching of reference lists and reviews will identify relevant studies for inclusion. To be eligible for inclusion, studies must report on the outcomes of an intervention targeting stress management and resilience in stroke survivors. Study selection and critical appraisal of selected studies will be carried out independently by two authors, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Data will be charted using a standard extraction form. Results will be tabulated and narratively summarised to highlight findings relevant to our research questions and to inform recommendations for future research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethics approval. This scoping review will provide a synthesis of evidence for stress management interventions in stroke survivors. It will identify and clarify the gaps in stress research specific to stroke pathologies and highlight promising interventions for future research. Findings will be relevant to researchers and healthcare workers and will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

Indexed as

HumansScoping Reviews as TopicStress, PsychologicalStrokeSurvivorsepidemiologymental healthrehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID32220915
PMCPMC7170611
OpenAlexW3013489121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.