Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32220838›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2020

Contrasting Patterns of Functional Diversity in Coffee Root Fungal Communities Associated with Organic and Conventionally Managed Fields.

Elizabeth C Sternhagen, Katie L Black, Eliza D L Hartmann, W Gaya Shivega, Peter G Johnson, Riley D McGlynn, Logan C Schmaltz, Rebecca J Asheim Keller, Stefanie N Vink, Laura Aldrich-Wolfe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth C SternhagenDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-1448
Katie L BlackBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.
Eliza D L HartmannBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3401-0496
W Gaya ShivegaBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-543X
Peter G JohnsonBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9049-3483
Riley D McGlynnBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.
Logan C SchmaltzBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca J Asheim KellerBiology Department, Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota, USA.
Stefanie N VinkGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3215-5491
Laura Aldrich-WolfeDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA laura.aldrichwolfe@ndsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9758-701X
Concordia College - Minnesota · USNorth Dakota State University · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure and function of fungal communities in the coffee rhizosphere are influenced by crop environment. Because coffee can be grown along a management continuum from conventional application of pesticides and fertilizers in full sun to organic management in a shaded understory, we used coffee fields to hold host constant while comparing rhizosphere fungal communities under markedly different environmental conditions with regard to shade and inputs. We characterized the shade and soil environment in 25 fields under conventional, organic, or transitional management in two regions of Costa Rica. We amplified the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of fungal DNA from coffee roots in these fields and characterized the rhizosphere fungal community via high-throughput sequencing. Sequences were assigned to guilds to determine differences in functional diversity and trophic structure among coffee field environments. Organic fields had more shade, a greater richness of shade tree species, and more leaf litter and were less acidic, with lower soil nitrate availability and higher soil copper, calcium, and magnesium availability than conventionally managed fields, although differences between organic and conventionally managed fields in shade and calcium and magnesium availability depended on region. Differences in richness and community composition of rhizosphere fungi between organic and conventionally managed fields were also correlated with shade, soil acidity, and nitrate and copper availability. Trophic structure differed with coffee field management. Saprotrophs, plant pathogens, and mycoparasites were more diverse, and plant pathogens were more abundant, in organic than in conventionally managed fields, while saprotroph-plant pathogens were more abundant in conventionally managed fields. These differences reflected environmental differences and depended on region.

Indexed as

MycobiomeOrganic AgricultureRhizosphereCoffeaCosta RicaFungiPlant Rootscoffeefield managementfunctional diversityfungiguildmetabarcodingnitrogenorganic agricultureshadesoil ecology

Identifiers

PMID32220838
PMCPMC7237791
OpenAlexW3013956355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.