ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Evaluation of a rapid turn-over, fully-automated ADAMTS13 activity assay: a method comparison study.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A Vortex-Shear-Based Assay for Cleavage of Multimeric VWF by ADAMTS13.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The landscape of ADAMTS13-related tests in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Practical Considerations for the Use of the Rapid AcuStarJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A comparative study of anti-ADAMTS-13 antibody dynamics in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of rapid vs in-house vs send-out ADAMTS13 testing for immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: pathogenesis and novel therapies: a narrative review.Annals of blood · 2023Article
- ADAMTS13 Biomarkers in Management of Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Review
- Global Health Resource Utilization and Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutics and Diagnostics in Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Distinguishing and overlapping laboratory results of thrombotic microangiopathies in HIV infection: Can scoring systems assist?Journal of clinical apheresis · 2022Article
- Assay for ADAMTS-13 Activity with Flow Cytometric Readout.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and follow-up of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with an automated chemiluminescent ADAMTS13 activity immunoassay.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy caused by severely reduced activity of the von-Willebrand factor-cleaving protease ADAMTS13, mainly caused by anti-ADAMTS-13 antibodies. Although several test systems for ADAMTS13 measurement exist, long turn-around times hamper the usability in daily practice. We performed a method comparison study for two commercially available ADAMTS13 assays and evaluated the agreement between the fully-automated rapid turn-over HemosIL AcuStar ADAMTS13 Activity assay and the manually performed TECHNOZYM ADAMTS-13 Activity assay. Twenty-four paired test samples derived from 10 consecutively recruited patients (n = 8, acquired TTP; n = 1, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; n = 1, control), of which nine test samples were collected in case of clinically apparent TTP and 13 samples were collected from TTP patients in clinical remission were included. Overall correlation between the TECHNOZYM and AcuStar assay was good with a Pearson R of 0.93 (p < 0.001). Agreement between the assays assessed with the Passing-Bablok analysis showed high agreement with an Intercept of - 2.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], - 5.07 to - 0.86) and Slope of 1.04 (95% CI 0.84-1.17). The absolute mean bias was 2.54% (standard difference [SD], 6.38%; 95% CI to 10.0-15.05%). Intra-method reliability was high with an absolute mean bias of - 0.13% (SD 3.21%; 95% CI to 6.42-6.16%). The observer agreement for categorial thresholds (> or < 10% ADAMTS3 activity) was kappa = 0.82 (95% CI 0.59-1.0). Conclusively, overall agreement between the testing methods was sufficient and we support previously published data suggesting the AcuStar assay being a valuable and accurate tool for ADAMTS13 activity testing and TTP diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.