Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219699›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2020

In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting.

Pelin Tan, Tyler M Ensor, William E Hockley, Geoffrey W Harrison, Daryl E Wilson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reduced relational and item-specific processing in cognitive offloading.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Less Than Zero?Experimental psychology · 2025
    Article
  9. Directed Forgetting and the Production Effect.Experimental psychology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pelin TanDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. pelin.tan@uwaterloo.ca.
Tyler M EnsorDepartment of Psychology, California State University, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
William E HockleyDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Geoffrey W HarrisonDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Daryl E WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the substantial evidence highlighting the role of selective rehearsal in item-method directed forgetting, recent work has suggested that forgetting may occur as a function of an active inhibitory mechanism that is more effortful than elaborative rehearsal processes. In the present work, we test this hypothesis by implementing a double-item presentation within the item-method directed forgetting paradigm. Participants studied two unrelated items at a time. Some words were followed by the same cue, and participants were instructed to remember or forget both items (pure condition). On other trials, participants were to remember one but forget the other word (mixed condition). Selective rehearsal and inhibition accounts make distinct predictions regarding memory performance in the double-item presentation. In Experiment 1, we compared recognition performance in the pure and mixed conditions, while in Experiment 2, we included a neutral baseline condition to further distinguish between the selective rehearsal and inhibition accounts. Contrary to the inhibition account but consistent with selective rehearsal, we found for both remember and forget items that recognition was greater in the mixed than in the pure condition. Recognition for forget items also did not differ from neutral items. We conclude that selective rehearsal, not inhibition, is responsible for item-method directed forgetting.

Indexed as

CuesInhibition, PsychologicalPractice, PsychologicalAdultHumansMaleMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAttentional inhibitionDouble presentationItem-method directed forgettingSelective rehearsal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.