ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Highlighting of the antialgal activity of organic extracts of Moroccan macrophytes: potential use in cyanobacteria blooms control.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Algicidal Macrophyte Metabolites on Cyanobacteria, Microcystins, Other Plankton, and Fish in Microcosms.Toxins · 2023Article
- Remediation Strategies to Control Toxic Cyanobacterial Blooms: Effects of Macrophyte Aqueous Extracts onMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Combined Effects of Allelopathic Polyphenols onFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of algicidal compounds produced by macrophytes against microalgae. The aim of this study was to assess the algicidal activity of seven Moroccan macrophyte ethyl acetate extracts (MEA) to control harmful algal blooms (HABs). The response and sensitivity of prokaryotic toxic cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa) and eukaryotic microalgae (Chlorella sp.) were highlighted. The algicidal effect of MEA extracts against the two microalgae was assessed using both the paper disc diffusion and microdilution methods. This last was used in order to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum algicidal concentrations (MAC). Results showed that the growth of both microalgae was significantly inhibited by all MEA extracts. Myriophyllum spicatum organic extract shows the highest growth inhibition activity against M. aeruginosa (35.33 ± 1.53) and Chlorella sp. (30.33 ± 1.15 mm). This stronger inhibitory activity was confirmed by the low MIC (6.25, 12.5 mg/L) and MAC (6.25, 12.5 mg/L) values. Furthermore, results showed different sensitivity between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic microalgae into MEA extracts. Based on the MIC and MAC values, we can distinguish two groups of plants. The first one, including M. spicatum, Ranunculus aquatilis, and Enteromorpha sp., can be considered as a preferable anti-prokaryotic group with a stronger inhibitory activity on M. aeruginosa growth. The second group, constituted by Potamogeton natans, Nasturtium officinale, Elodea sp., and Ceratophyllum sp., has a preferable and stronger inhibitory effect against eukaryotic algae (Chlorella sp.). Overall the results reveal the potential algicidal activity of macrophytes and suggested that MEA extracts could play an important role in biocontrol of HABs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.