ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020
Evaluation of arthroscopic skills with a virtual reality simulator in first-year orthopaedic residents.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Pooled it
- Design of a multitissue osteoarticular 3D-Printed knee model for initial training in meniscal repair.SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel, Affordable, and Accessible Simulation for Teaching Rotator Cuff Repair.Cureus · 2025Article
- Current status of virtual reality simulation education for orthopedic residents: the need for a change in focus.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023Review
- SICOT PIONEER (Programme of Innovative Orthopaedic Networking Education and Research): Re-inventing global orthopaedic education, training and research.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Simulation in shoulder arthroplasty education using three-dimensional planning software: the role of guidelines and predicted range of motion.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Serious Games for Improving Technical Skills in Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR serious games · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study of residents' initial performance was performed to determine which factors predisposed residents for success in demonstrating the best arthroscopic skills.
methodsEach orthopaedic first-year resident was officially invited to take part in a one hour evaluation on a VirtaMed™ ArthroS™ simulator. On the FAST module, the Periscoping exercise was chosen to test for use of angled optics. The Shoulder Module was chosen to test their ability to extract intra-articular foreign bodies using the Catch the Stars exercise. The variables such as time, camera alignment, camera path length, and grasper path length were analysed. Residents completed a questionnaire prior to the evaluation. Their results were analysed according to gender, orientation assessment, and surgical history.
resultsA total of 34 women and 82 men were included in the study. In the Periscoping exercise, a significant difference between women and men in the time variables was noticed (275 ± 82 and 195 ± 71; p < 0.00001) and camera path length (207 ± 60 and 170 ± 66; p = 0.00094). For the Catch the Stars exercise, there was a significant difference between women and men for the time values (249 ± 114 and 201 ± 99; p = 0.01246) and grasper path length (290 ± 130 and 229 ± 108; p = 0.00493). After multivariate analysis, no influence of self-assessed spatial perception (p=0.1), number of arthroscopic procedures (p=0.39), or laparoscopic procedures (p=0.43) to which they had already assisted was found.
conclusionsThis study shows a significant difference in skills regarding spatial recognition and triangulation related to gender at the beginning of specialization training. It also demonstrates that male medical students are more attracted by surgical departments during their medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32219495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.