Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219306›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Homoeologous gene expression and co-expression network analyses and evolutionary inference in allopolyploids.

Guanjing Hu, Corrinne E Grover, Mark A Arick, Meiling Liu, Daniel G Peterson, Jonathan F Wendel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative multi "omics" profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guanjing HuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Corrinne E GroverDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Mark A ArickDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Meiling LiuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Daniel G PetersonDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidy is a widespread phenomenon throughout eukaryotes. Due to the coexistence of duplicated genomes, polyploids offer unique challenges for estimating gene expression levels, which is essential for understanding the massive and various forms of transcriptomic responses accompanying polyploidy. Although previous studies have explored the bioinformatics of polyploid transcriptomic profiling, the causes and consequences of inaccurate quantification of transcripts from duplicated gene copies have not been addressed. Using transcriptomic data from the cotton genus (Gossypium) as an example, we present an analytical workflow to evaluate a variety of bioinformatic method choices at different stages of RNA-seq analysis, from homoeolog expression quantification to downstream analysis used to infer key phenomena of polyploid expression evolution. In general, EAGLE-RC and GSNAP-PolyCat outperform other quantification pipelines tested, and their derived expression dataset best represents the expected homoeolog expression and co-expression divergence. The performance of co-expression network analysis was less affected by homoeolog quantification than by network construction methods, where weighted networks outperformed binary networks. By examining the extent and consequences of homoeolog read ambiguity, we illuminate the potential artifacts that may affect our understanding of duplicate gene expression, including an overestimation of homoeolog co-regulation and the incorrect inference of subgenome asymmetry in network topology. Taken together, our work points to a set of reasonable practices that we hope are broadly applicable to the evolutionary exploration of polyploids.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantPolyploidyDatasets as TopicGenes, PlantGossypiumRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Messengerallopolyploidco-expression gene networkdifferential expressionhomoeolog-specific read partitioningRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID32219306
PMCPMC7986634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.