ArticleThe semantic Web--ISWC ... : ... International Semantic Web Conference ... proceedings. International Semantic Web Conference2017
The CEDAR Workbench: An Ontology-Assisted Environment for Authoring Metadata that Describe Scientific Experiments.
Article in The semantic Web--ISWC ... : ... International Semantic Web Conference ... proceedings. International Semantic Web Conference, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- The FAIRSCAPE AI-readiness Framework for Biomedical Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The development of the Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (HHEAR) Data Repository for environmental epidemiology research.Environment international · 2026Article
- How to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis in response to an emerging pathogen: Lessons learned from Zika and COVID-19.Research synthesis methods · 2026Review
- Standardizing Survey Data Collection to Enhance Reproducibility: Development and Comparative Evaluation of the ReproSchema Ecosystem.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets.Scientific data · 2025Article
- An approach to making life sciences FAIR-FAIR-DS as a tool for Aspergillus fumigatus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Extraction of biological terms using large language models enhances the usability of metadata in the BioSample database.GigaScience · 2025Article
- The text2term tool to map free-text descriptions of biomedical terms to ontologies.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Structured Knowledge Base Enhances Effective Use of Large Language Models for Metadata Curation.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Modeling Precision Feedback Knowledge for Healthcare Professional Learning and Quality Improvement.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- FAIR data station for lightweight metadata management and validation of omics studies.GigaScience · 2022Article
- CORAL: A framework for rigorous self-validated data modeling and integrative, reproducible data analysis.GigaScience · 2022Article
- FAIR Genomes metadata schema promoting Next Generation Sequencing data reuse in Dutch healthcare and research.Scientific data · 2022Article
- A collaborative semantic-based provenance management platform for reproducibility.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Categorizing metadata to help mobilize computable biomedical knowledge.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- From Reductionism to Reintegration: Solving society's most pressing problems requires building bridges between data types across the life sciences.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for annotating sequencing experiments.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- An open-source framework for neuroscience metadata management applied to digital reconstructions of neuronal morphology.Brain informatics · 2020Article
- Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: the OpenPREDICT use case.PeerJ. Computer science · 2020Article
- Selected articles from the Third International Workshop on Semantics-Powered Data Analytics (SEPDA 2018).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval (CEDAR) aims to revolutionize the way that metadata describing scientific experiments are authored. The software we have developed-the CEDAR Workbench-is a suite of Web-based tools and REST APIs that allows users to construct metadata templates, to fill in templates to generate high-quality metadata, and to share and manage these resources. The CEDAR Workbench provides a versatile, REST-based environment for authoring metadata that are enriched with terms from ontologies. The metadata are available as JSON, JSON-LD, or RDF for easy integration in scientific applications and reusability on the Web. Users can leverage our APIs for validating and submitting metadata to external repositories. The CEDAR Workbench is freely available and open-source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.