Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219185›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2020

Channel management in virtual care.

Matt Desruisseaux, Vess Stamenova, R Sacha Bhatia, Onil Bhattacharyya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Toward a universal definition of provider-patient attachment in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Tele-Neuro-Ophthalmology: Vision for 20/20 and Beyond.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matt Desruisseaux1McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1764-4286
Vess Stamenova2Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-7766
R Sacha Bhatia2Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-5318
Onil Bhattacharyya2Women's College Hospital Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-7288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many virtual care initiatives focus heavily on video visits, essentially mimicking face-to-face visits. Meanwhile, clinicians in established settings continue to use the oldest modality, phone calls, and some use the most ubiquitous, asynchronous messaging. The latter, along with live chat and chatbots, could be transformative if workflows were redesigned to incorporate it. With multiple modalities now available for use in virtual care, the central problem is to direct patient-provider interactions to the channels generating the most value. Marketers call this channel management and use sophisticated approaches to implement it. We propose an adaptation of channel management to virtual care and discuss anticipated challenges to its implementation.

Indexed as

Health care economicsHealth policyHealth servicesTechnology

Identifiers

PMID32219185
PMCPMC7096521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.