Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219184›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2020

Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: a critical review.

Stevie Chancellor, Munmun De Choudhury

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
59.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 493 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring approaches to computational representation and classification of user-generated meal logs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stevie Chancellor1Department of Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA.
Munmun De Choudhury2School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Leveraging Social Media Data and Machine Learning to Optimize Treatment Paradigms for Youth with SchizophreniaR01MH117172 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DE CHOUDHURY, MUNMUN · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Social Media Signals for Post-traumatic Stress and Anxiety in Crisis-Inflicted CommunitiesR01GM112697 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DE CHOUDHURY, MUNMUN · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112697NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media is now being used to model mental well-being, and for understanding health outcomes. Computer scientists are now using quantitative techniques to predict the presence of specific mental disorders and symptomatology, such as depression, suicidality, and anxiety. This research promises great benefits to monitoring efforts, diagnostics, and intervention design for these mental health statuses. Yet, there is no standardized process for evaluating the validity of this research and the methods adopted in the design of these studies. We conduct a systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art in predicting mental health status using social media data, focusing on characteristics of the study design, methods, and research design. We find 75 studies in this area published between 2013 and 2018. Our results outline the methods of data annotation for mental health status, data collection and quality management, pre-processing and feature selection, and model selection and verification. Despite growing interest in this field, we identify concerning trends around construct validity, and a lack of reflection in the methods used to operationalize and identify mental health status. We provide some recommendations to address these challenges, including a list of proposed reporting standards for publications and collaboration opportunities in this interdisciplinary space.

Indexed as

Computer scienceMedical research

Identifiers

PMID32219184
PMCPMC7093465
OpenAlexW3013908145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.