Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219153›Full record

ReviewNPJ breast cancer2020

Incorporation of clinical and biological factors improves prognostication and reflects contemporary clinical practice.

Rashmi K Murthy, Juhee Song, Akshara S Raghavendra, Yisheng Li, Limin Hsu, Kenneth R Hess, Carlos H Barcenas, Vicente Valero, Robert W Carlson, Debu Tripathy and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ breast cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rashmi K Murthy1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Juhee Song2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Akshara S Raghavendra1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Yisheng Li2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9847-8544
Limin Hsu1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Kenneth R Hess2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1377-6070
Carlos H Barcenas1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Vicente Valero1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Robert W CarlsonNational Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®), Fort Washington, PA USA.
Debu Tripathy1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Gabriel N Hortobagyi1Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-4412

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed prognostic models for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) that consider anatomic stage and other important determinants of prognosis and survival in breast cancer, such as age, grade, and receptor-based subtypes with the intention to demonstrate that these factors, conditional on stage, improve prediction of BCSS. A total of 20,928 patients with stage I-III invasive primary breast cancer treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1990 and 2016, who received surgery as an initial treatment were identified to generate prognostic models by Fine-Gray competing risk regression model. Model predictive accuracy was assessed using Harrell's C-index. The Aalen-Johansen estimator and a selected Fine-Gray model were used to estimate the 5-year and 10-year BCSS probabilities. The performance of the selected model was evaluated by assessing discrimination and prediction calibration in an external validation dataset of 29,727 patients from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The inclusion of age, grade, and receptor-based subtype in addition to stage significantly improved the model predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.774 (95% CI 0.755-0.794) vs. 0.692 for stage alone,

Indexed as

Breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32219153
PMCPMC7096449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.