Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219139›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2020

Overall Postoperative Morbidity and Pancreatic Fistula Are Relatively Higher after Central Pancreatectomy than Distal Pancreatic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Parbatraj Regmi, Qing Yang, Hai-Jie Hu, Fei Liu, Hare Ram Karn, Wen-Jie Ma, Cong-Dun Ran, Fu-Yu Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Central pancreatectomy: a Latin American experience of parenchyma-sparing surgery for benign and low-grade pancreatic neoplasms.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Robotic central pancreatectomy: a surgical technique.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Parbatraj RegmiDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Qing YangDepartment of General Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Medical School of Chengdu Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China.
Hai-Jie HuDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Fei LiuDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Hare Ram KarnDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Wen-Jie MaDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Cong-Dun RanDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
Fu-Yu LiDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-2887
Sichuan University · CNThird People's Hospital of Chengdu · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of central pancreatectomy (CP) with distal pancreatectomy (DP).

methodsA systematic literature search was performed on electronic databases from MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed from 1998 to 2018. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were performed using statistics/data analysis (Stata®) software, version 12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas 77845, USA). Dichotomous variables were analyzed by estimation of relative risk (RR) with a 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) and continuous variables were analyzed by standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI.

resultsTwenty-four studies with 593 CP and 1226 DP were included in the meta-analysis. CP had significantly longer operation time (SMD: 1.03; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.44;

conclusionCP is associated with significantly higher morbidity and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. CP should only be reserved for selected patients who require postoperative pancreatic function preservation.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionDatabases, FactualHumansLength of StayMorbidityOperative TimePancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsReoperation

Identifiers

PMID32219139
PMCPMC7057026
OpenAlexW3007964122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.