Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219138›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Risk Factors for Brain Metastases in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Zhi-Bin Ke, Shao-Hao Chen, Ye-Hui Chen, Yu-Peng Wu, Fei Lin, Xue-Yi Xue, Qing-Shui Zheng, Ning Xu, Yong Wei

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhi-Bin KeDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7563-7781
Shao-Hao ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-4428
Ye-Hui ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-6637
Yu-Peng WuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7712-4317
Fei LinDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-6867
Xue-Yi XueDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-7435
Qing-Shui ZhengDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-6501
Ning XuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-7025
Yong WeiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-3733
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with brain metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were considered to experience a poor prognosis. However, there is little knowledge on the risk factors for BM from RCC at diagnosis. This study was aimed at exploring the risk factors for patients with BM from RCC and the interaction among these risk factors.

methodsA total of 38759 cases of RCC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Risk factors for BM from RCC were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Interaction effect between age and tumor size was tested.

resultsThere was a significant difference in univariate analysis, including T stage, tumor size, grades III and IV, lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and surgery. There was a significant difference in multivariate analysis, including age, T stage, tumor size < 10 cm, grade IV, lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, lung metastasis, and surgery. Patients older than 70 had 0.653-fold lower risk of developing BM compared with those younger than 70. Patients with tumor size ≥ 4 cm and <10 cm had higher risk of developing BM compared with those < 4 cm. The larger the tumor size, the higher the incidence of BM from RCC in those whose tumor size was less than 10 cm. An interaction test between the tumor size and age on brain metastasis was statistically significant in the crude analysis (

conclusionBoth tumor size and age were independent risk factors for brain metastases in patients with RCC. The impact of age on the risk of developing BM from RCC was limited to patients with tumor size ≥ 7 cm. Patients with a larger tumor size and younger age might have the higher risk of developing BM at diagnosis of RCC.

Indexed as

AgedBone NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansIncidenceKidney NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID32219138
PMCPMC7085365
OpenAlexW3009840511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.