ReviewCureus2020
Patient Engagement and Patient Safety: Are We Missing the Patient in the Center?
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The safety of health care for ethnic minority patients: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2020Pooled it
- Slipping Through the Chasm of Multicenter Hand-offs-Rare Incidence of Nintedanib Induced Renal Failure: Case Report.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2026Article
- Patient-Centered Healthcare: From Patient Experience to Human Experience.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2024Article
- Article
- Improving patient experience by implementing an organisational culture model.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Improving Emergency Department Patient Experience Through an Organizational Values-Aligned Standardized Behavioral Model.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2023Article
- What are the reasons for unfinished nursing care as perceived by hospitalized patients? Findings from a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Investigating the Mediating Effect of Patient Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Patient Safety Engagement and Patient Safety in Healthcare Professionals.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Patient safety improvement with the patient engagement in Iran: A best practice implementation project.PloS one · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global healthcare delivery paradigm shift calls for enhanced strategies to engage patients in delivering safer and high-quality healthcare. There still exists a gap area in a globally accepted measure for the person-centered care. Recent tri-institutional global quality reports from National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NAESM), World Bank Group, and Lancet Global Health Commission attempted to report the patient engagement measures used globally. We aim to understand the variation in these globally reported patient-centered care measures and highlight the recent proactive strategies to enhance patient engagement to improve patient safety. I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.