Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32219022›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Alternative dietary protein and water temperature influence the skin and gut microbial communities of yellowtail kingfish (

Jack Horlick, Mark A Booth, Sasha G Tetu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Impacts of Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jack HorlickDepartment of Molecular Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark A BoothNSW Department of Primary Industries, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, Nelson Bay, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-8012
Sasha G TetuDepartment of Molecular Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish skin and gut microbiomes contribute to host health and growth and are often significantly different in aquaculture-reared fish compared to wild fish. Determining how factors associated with aquaculture, including altered diet and abiotic conditions, affect the microbiome will assist with optimizing farming practices and non-invasively assessing fish health. Here, juvenile yellowtail kingfish (

Indexed as

AquacultureAquafeedMicrobiomePhotobacteriumSeriola lalandiSoy-protein concentrateTemperatureYellowtail kingfish

Identifiers

PMID32219022
PMCPMC7085898
OpenAlexW3010998863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.