Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218950›Full record

ReviewRoyal Society open science2020

Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy and its applications.

Shengda Pu, Chen Gong, Alex W Robertson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A workflow for correlativeNanoscale horizons · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in MoSBiosensors · 2025
    Review
  9. Chemical science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Liquid Phase Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Ultrastructure.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shengda PuDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK.
Chen GongDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK.
Alex W RobertsonDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-6482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has long been an essential tool for understanding the structure of materials. Over the past couple of decades, this venerable technique has undergone a number of revolutions, such as the development of aberration correction for atomic level imaging, the realization of cryogenic TEM for imaging biological specimens, and new instrumentation permitting the observation of dynamic systems

Indexed as

in situ transmission electron microscopyliquid cell transmission electron microscopytransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID32218950
PMCPMC7029903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.