Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218644›Full record

ArticleNeurology, psychiatry, and brain research2020

Defining Major Depressive Disorder Cohorts Using the EHR: Multiple Phenotypes Based on ICD-9 Codes and Medication Orders.

Wendy Marie Ingram, Anna M Baker, Christopher R Bauer, Jason P Brown, Fernando S Goes, Sharon Larson, Peter P Zandi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, psychiatry, and brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Are Noradrenergic Transmission Reducing Drugs Antidepressants?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy Marie IngramDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1643-3367
Anna M BakerDepartment of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher R BauerBiomedical and Translational Informatics Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jason P BrownBiomedical and Translational Informatics Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fernando S GoesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sharon LarsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Peter P ZandiDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USGeisinger Health System · USBucknell University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32MH014592 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HEATHER E VOLK, Peter P. Zandi · 1985 to 2026
$8.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental illnesses and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Electronic Health Records (EHR) allow researchers to conduct unprecedented large-scale observational studies investigating MDD, its disease development and its interaction with other health outcomes. While there exist methods to classify patients as clear cases or controls, given specific data requirements, there are presently no simple, generalizable, and validated methods to classify an entire patient population into varying groups of depression likelihood and severity.

methodsWe have tested a simple, pragmatic electronic phenotype algorithm that classifies patients into one of five mutually exclusive, ordinal groups, varying in depression phenotype. Using data from an integrated health system on 278,026 patients from a 10-year study period we have tested the convergent validity of these constructs using measures of external validation, including patterns of psychiatric prescriptions, symptom severity, indicators of suicidality, comorbidity, mortality, health care utilization, and polygenic risk scores for MDD.

resultsWe found consistent patterns of increasing morbidity and/or adverse outcomes across the five groups, providing evidence for convergent validity. LIMITATIONS: The study population is from a single rural integrated health system which is predominantly white, possibly limiting its generalizability.

conclusionOur study provides initial evidence that a simple algorithm, generalizable to most EHR data sets, provides categories with meaningful face and convergent validity that can be used for stratification of an entire patient population.

Indexed as

Clinical informaticsDepressionElectronic health recordsPhenotypic algorithms

Identifiers

PMID32218644
PMCPMC7098618
OpenAlexW3007055256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.