ArticleNeurology, psychiatry, and brain research2020
Defining Major Depressive Disorder Cohorts Using the EHR: Multiple Phenotypes Based on ICD-9 Codes and Medication Orders.
Article in Neurology, psychiatry, and brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- An electronic health record (EHR) phenotype algorithm to identify patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and psychiatric comorbidities.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Trial
- Assessing the generalizability of prevalence estimates from the All of Us Research Program.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk for depression is associated with post-stroke depression and stroke.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Identifying primary-care features associated with complex mental health difficulties.PloS one · 2025Article
- An evolutionary concept analysis of depression in Black mothers.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2024Review
- Depression phenotypes in spinal cord injury and impact on post-injury healthcare utilization and cost: Analysis using a large claim database.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024Observational
- Case Identification of Depression in Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Creating a next-generation phenotype library: the health data research UK Phenotype Library.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Article
- A Framework for Automating Psychiatric Distress Screening in Ophthalmology Clinics Using an EHR-Derived AI Algorithm.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Article
- Combining structured and unstructured data in EMRs to create clinically-defined EMR-derived cohorts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Are Noradrenergic Transmission Reducing Drugs Antidepressants?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Co-Occurring Opioid Use and Depressive Disorders: Patient Characteristics and Co-Occurring Health Conditions.Journal of dual diagnosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental illnesses and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Electronic Health Records (EHR) allow researchers to conduct unprecedented large-scale observational studies investigating MDD, its disease development and its interaction with other health outcomes. While there exist methods to classify patients as clear cases or controls, given specific data requirements, there are presently no simple, generalizable, and validated methods to classify an entire patient population into varying groups of depression likelihood and severity.
methodsWe have tested a simple, pragmatic electronic phenotype algorithm that classifies patients into one of five mutually exclusive, ordinal groups, varying in depression phenotype. Using data from an integrated health system on 278,026 patients from a 10-year study period we have tested the convergent validity of these constructs using measures of external validation, including patterns of psychiatric prescriptions, symptom severity, indicators of suicidality, comorbidity, mortality, health care utilization, and polygenic risk scores for MDD.
resultsWe found consistent patterns of increasing morbidity and/or adverse outcomes across the five groups, providing evidence for convergent validity. LIMITATIONS: The study population is from a single rural integrated health system which is predominantly white, possibly limiting its generalizability.
conclusionOur study provides initial evidence that a simple algorithm, generalizable to most EHR data sets, provides categories with meaningful face and convergent validity that can be used for stratification of an entire patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.