Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218605›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Auditory chain reaction: Effects of sound pressure and particle motion on auditory structures in fishes.

Tanja Schulz-Mirbach, Friedrich Ladich, Alberto Mittone, Margie Olbinado, Alberto Bravin, Isabelle P Maiditsch, Roland R Melzer, Petr Krysl, Martin Heß

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hearing in catfishes: 200 years of research.Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tanja Schulz-MirbachDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-2707
Friedrich LadichDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alberto MittoneEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-5714
Margie OlbinadoEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Alberto BravinEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France.
Isabelle P MaiditschDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland R MelzerDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Petr KryslDepartment of Structural Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Martin HeßDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility · FRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Vienna · ATBavarian State Collection of Zoology · DEUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the diversity in fish auditory structures, it remains elusive how otolith morphology and swim bladder-inner ear (= otophysic) connections affect otolith motion and inner ear stimulation. A recent study visualized sound-induced otolith motion; but tank acoustics revealed a complex mixture of sound pressure and particle motion. To separate sound pressure and sound-induced particle motion, we constructed a transparent standing wave tube-like tank equipped with an inertial shaker at each end while using X-ray phase contrast imaging. Driving the shakers in phase resulted in maximised sound pressure at the tank centre, whereas particle motion was maximised when shakers were driven out of phase (180°). We studied the effects of two types of otophysic connections-i.e. the Weberian apparatus (Carassius auratus) and anterior swim bladder extensions contacting the inner ears (Etroplus canarensis)-on otolith motion when fish were subjected to a 200 Hz stimulus. Saccular otolith motion was more pronounced when the swim bladder walls oscillated under the maximised sound pressure condition. The otolith motion patterns mainly matched the orientation patterns of ciliary bundles on the sensory epithelia. Our setup enabled the characterization of the interplay between the auditory structures and provided first experimental evidence of how different types of otophysic connections affect otolith motion.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAir SacsAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCichlidsGoldfishHearingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOtolithic MembraneSwimmingTomography

Identifiers

PMID32218605
PMCPMC7100961
OpenAlexW3014010068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.