Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218521›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Automated detection algorithm for C4d immunostaining showed comparable diagnostic performance to pathologists in renal allograft biopsy.

Gyuheon Choi, Young-Gon Kim, Haeyon Cho, Namkug Kim, Hyunna Lee, Kyung Chul Moon, Heounjeong Go

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Artificial intelligence in kidney transplant pathology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gyuheon Choi *Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-987X
Young-Gon Kim *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Institute of Life Science, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Haeyon ChoDepartment of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Namkug KimDepartment of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Hyunna LeeDepartment of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-3086
Kyung Chul MoonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehang-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Heounjeong GoDepartment of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. damul37@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0412-8709
Ulsan College · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center 2018-7028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A deep learning-based image analysis could improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in pathology work. Recently, we proposed a deep learning-based detection algorithm for C4d immunostaining in renal allografts. The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the algorithm by comparing pathologists' diagnoses and analyzing the associations of the algorithm with clinical data. C4d immunostaining slides of renal allografts were obtained from two different institutions (100 slides from the Asan Medical Center and 86 slides from the Seoul National University Hospital) and scanned using two different slide scanners. Three pathologists and the algorithm independently evaluated each slide according to the Banff 2017 criteria. Subsequently, they jointly reviewed the results for consensus scoring. The result of the algorithm was compared with that of each pathologist and the consensus diagnosis. Clinicopathological associations of the results of the algorithm with allograft survival, histologic evidence of microvascular inflammation, and serologic results for donor-specific antibodies were also analyzed. As a result, the reproducibility between the pathologists was fair to moderate (kappa 0.36-0.54), which is comparable to that between the algorithm and each pathologist (kappa 0.34-0.51). The C4d scores predicted by the algorithm achieved substantial concordance with the consensus diagnosis (kappa = 0.61), and they were significantly associated with remarkable microvascular inflammation (P = 0.001), higher detection rate of donor-specific antibody (P = 0.003), and shorter graft survival (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the deep learning-based C4d detection algorithm showed a diagnostic performance similar to that of the pathologists.

Indexed as

AllograftsDeep LearningKidney TransplantationBiopsyComplement C4bFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsComplement C4bcomplement C4dPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID32218521
OpenAlexW3013525292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.