Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218445›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Ionic amplifying circuits inspired by electronics and biology.

Rachel A Lucas, Chih-Yuan Lin, Lane A Baker, Zuzanna S Siwy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A nanofluidic oscillating neuron.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Anodized Aluminum Oxide Membrane Ionic Memristors.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel A LucasDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Chih-Yuan LinDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-5548
Lane A BakerDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, 800 E. Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-507X
Zuzanna S SiwyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. zsiwy@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2626-7873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated circuits are present in all electronic devices, and enable signal amplification, modulation, and relay. Nature uses another type of circuits composed of channels in a cell membrane, which regulate and amplify transport of ions, not electrons and holes as is done in electronic systems. Here we show an abiotic ionic circuit that is inspired by concepts from electronics and biology. The circuit amplifies small ionic signals into ionic outputs, and its operation mimics the electronic Darlington amplifier composed of transistors. The individual transistors are pores equipped with three terminals including a gate that is able to enrich or deplete ions in the pore. The circuits we report function at gate voltages < 1 V, respond to sub-nA gate currents, and offer ion current amplification with a gain up to ~300. Ionic amplifiers are a logical step toward improving chemical and biochemical sensing, separations and amplification, among others.

Identifiers

PMID32218445
PMCPMC7099069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.