Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218303›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Radiopharmaceuticals for Breast Cancer and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Two Examples of How Tissue Characterization May Influence the Choice of Therapy.

Alberto Signore, Chiara Lauri, Sveva Auletta, Michela Varani, Livia Onofrio, Andor W J M Glaudemans, Francesco Panzuto, Paolo Marchetti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Development and evaluation ofAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Theranostic Advances in Breast Cancer in Nuclear Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto SignoreNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-648X
Chiara LauriNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Sveva AulettaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7183-1982
Michela VaraniNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7766-9031
Livia OnofrioNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Andor W J M GlaudemansDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands.
Francesco PanzutoDigestive Disease Unit, AOU Sant'Andrea and ENETS Center of Excellence, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiOncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, and IDI-IRCCS, 00189 Rome, Italy.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLSapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular medicine has gained clinical relevance for the detection and staging of oncological diseases, to guide therapy decision making and for therapy follow-up due to the availability of new highly sensitive hybrid imaging camera systems and the development of new tailored radiopharmaceuticals that target specific molecules. The knowledge of the expression of different receptors on the primary tumor and on metastases is important for both therapeutic and prognostic purposes and several approaches are available aiming to achieve personalized medicine in different oncological diseases. In this review, we describe the use of specific radiopharmaceuticals to image and predict therapy response in breast cancer and neuroendocrine tumors since they represent a paradigmatic example of the importance of tumoral characterization of hormonal receptors in order to plan a tailored treatment. The most attractive radiopharmaceuticals for breast cancer are 16α-[

Indexed as

breast cancerneuroendocrine tumorsnuclear medicinepersonalized medicinePET/CTradiopharmaceuticalstherapy decision makingtreatment response

Identifiers

PMID32218303
PMCPMC7226069
OpenAlexW3013073935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.