ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Internalization of miPEP165a into
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peptide hormones in shaping root system architecture and environmental adaptation: Current advances and translational perspectives.Plant communications · 2026Review
- misORFPred: A Novel Method to Mine Translatable sORFs in Plant Pri-miRNAs Using Enhanced Scalable k-mer and Dynamic Ensemble Voting Strategy.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Biological Activity of Artificial Plant Peptides Corresponding to the Translational Products of Small ORFs in Primary miRNAs and Other Long "Non-Coding" RNAs.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Emphasizing the Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs (lncRNA), Circular RNA (circRNA), and Micropeptides (miPs) in Plant Biotic Stress Tolerance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Regulatory miPEP Open Reading Frames Contained in the Primary Transcripts of microRNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The Essentials on microRNA-Encoded Peptides from Plants to Animals.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- MicroRNA: noncoding but still coding, another example of self-catalysis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Review
- MicroRNA858a, its encoded peptide, and phytosulfokine regulate Arabidopsis growth and development.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Coding of Non-coding RNA: Insights Into the Regulatory Functions of Pri-MicroRNA-Encoded Peptides in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Cell Signaling in Model Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MiPEPs are short natural peptides encoded by microRNAs in plants. Exogenous application of miPEPs increases the expression of their corresponding miRNA and, consequently, induces consistent phenotypical changes. Therefore, miPEPs carry huge potential in agronomy as gene regulators that do not require genome manipulation. However, to this end, it is necessary to know their mode of action, including where they act and how they enter the plants. Here, after analyzing the effect of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.