Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32218163›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Neuroprotective Strategies for Retinal Ganglion Cell Degeneration: Current Status and Challenges Ahead.

Raquel Boia, Noelia Ruzafa, Inês Dinis Aires, Xandra Pereiro, António Francisco Ambrósio, Elena Vecino, Ana Raquel Santiago

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Primary Cilia of Astrocytes in the Retina in Development and Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Retinal Ischemia: Therapeutic Effects and Mechanisms of Paeoniflorin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel BoiaCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Noelia RuzafaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Vizcaya, Spain.
Inês Dinis AiresCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Xandra PereiroDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Vizcaya, Spain.
António Francisco AmbrósioCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Elena VecinoDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Vizcaya, Spain.
Ana Raquel SantiagoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
University of the Basque Country · ESAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

Centro 2020 Regional Operational Programme CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008: BrainHealth 2020FEDER-COMPETE POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016849, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028417, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal (Fellowships PD/BD/114115/2015 and PD/BD/127821/2016, Grant PTDC/NEU-OSD/3123/2014 and Strategic Projects UID/NEU/04539/2013, UID/NEU/04539/2019, UIDP/04539/2020 and UIDB/04539/2020)UPV/EHU PPGA 18/18 and ELKARTEK KK-2019/00086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the output cells of the retina into the brain. In mammals, these cells are not able to regenerate their axons after optic nerve injury, leaving the patients with optic neuropathies with permanent visual loss. An effective RGCs-directed therapy could provide a beneficial effect to prevent the progression of the disease. Axonal injury leads to the functional loss of RGCs and subsequently induces neuronal death, and axonal regeneration would be essential to restore the neuronal connectivity, and to reestablish the function of the visual system. The manipulation of several intrinsic and extrinsic factors has been proposed in order to stimulate axonal regeneration and functional repairing of axonal connections in the visual pathway. However, there is a missing point in the process since, until now, there is no therapeutic strategy directed to promote axonal regeneration of RGCs as a therapeutic approach for optic neuropathies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionHumansNeuroprotective AgentsRetinal Ganglion CellsNeuroprotective Agentsaxonal regenerationneurodegenerationneuroprotectionoptic neuropathiesretinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID32218163
PMCPMC7177277
OpenAlexW3012959117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.