Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32217772›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Social media use by leading US e-cigarette, cigarette, smokeless tobacco, cigar and hookah brands.

Erin Keely O'Brien, Leah Hoffman, Mario Antonio Navarro, Ollie Ganz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perceptions of e-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Among Never Users of Nicotine in the European Union.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  10. The Impact of Cigarillo Text Warning Presence and Size on Young Adults' Cigarillo Risk Beliefs, Knowledge, Appeal, and Use Intentions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin Keely O'BrienOffice of Science, Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA erin.obrien@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6208-329X
Leah HoffmanOffice of Health Communication and Education, Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-3866
Mario Antonio NavarroOffice of Health Communication and Education, Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Ollie GanzOffice of Health Communication and Education, Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth and young adults frequently use social media and are susceptible to tobacco use. This study is the first to provide a systematic overview of how leading tobacco product brands use popular social media platforms.

methodsWe identified 112 leading brands of e-cigarettes, hookah, cigars, cigarettes and smokeless tobacco based on sales and self-report user data. We searched for each brand on six platforms: Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest and Tumblr. In early 2019, we conducted a content analysis of each page, coding: age restrictions, warning display, page characteristics and post characteristics.

resultsCigarette brands were generally not present. Most e-cigarettes, hookah and cigar brands had pages on at least two platforms. One-third of smokeless brands had pages on at least one platform. Few brands had pages on Pinterest and Tumblr. Most pages had existed for 3-5 years. Overall, brand pages rarely used age gating, did not display health warnings, generally posted images of a product alone and often used hashtags unrelated to tobacco. Brands commonly used special features like ephemeral posts on Instagram and pop-up chat windows on Facebook. Many pages displayed images of young people and mentioned flavour. Median followers per brand ranged from about 1 000-10 000, and total followers summed across brands reached over 5 million on Facebook and Instagram alone.

conclusionsLeading brands of most tobacco product types use social media extensively. Several findings identify issues related to youth exposure to and appeal of tobacco social media marketing. Findings can inform tobacco education efforts and regulation.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking Water PipesSocial MediaTobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessAdolescentHumansTobacco Useadvertising and promotionelectronic nicotine delivery devicesmedianon-cigarette tobacco productstobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID32217772
PMCPMC13019466
OpenAlexW3013644071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.