Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32217762›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced urological cancers with pre-existing autoimmune disorders: a retrospective international multicenter study.

Nieves Martinez Chanza, Wanling Xie, Majd Issa, Hannah Dzimitrowicz, Abhishek Tripathi, Benoit Beuselinck, Elaine Lam, Yousef Zakharia, Rana Mckay, Sumit Shah and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Lupus Erythematosus.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Immunotherapy in Special and Rare Situations: A Brief Review.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Nieves Martinez ChanzaMedical Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-7415
Wanling XieMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Majd IssaMedical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hannah DzimitrowiczMedical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abhishek TripathiHematology Oncology, University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-0673
Benoit BeuselinckMedical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Elaine LamMedical Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Yousef ZakhariaMedical Oncology, University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Rana MckayMedical Oncology, Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sumit ShahMedical Oncology, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Amir MortazaviMedical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michael R HarrisonMedical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Spyridon SiderisMedical Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Marina D KaymakcalanMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah Abou AlaiwiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amin H NassarMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8084-9105
Pier Vitale NuzzoMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-8079
Anis HamidMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Toni K ChoueiriMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-3217
Lauren C HarshmanMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA laurenC_harshman@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-1588
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BEThe Ohio State University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMoores Cancer CenterOklahoma State University Oklahoma City · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited experience regarding the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in patients with autoimmune disorders (AD) and advanced urological cancers as they are generally excluded from clinical trials due to risk of exacerbations.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) with pre-existing AD treated with CPI catalogued the incidence of AD exacerbations, new immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical outcomes. Competing risk models estimated cumulative incidences of exacerbations and new irAEs at 3 and 6 months.

resultsOf 106 patients with AD (58 RCC, 48 UC) from 10 centers, 35 (33%) had grade 1/2 clinically active AD of whom 10 (9%) required corticosteroids or immunomodulators at baseline. Exacerbations of pre-existing AD occurred in 38 (36%) patients with 17 (45%) requiring corticosteroids and 6 (16%) discontinuing CPI. New onset irAEs occurred in 40 (38%) patients with 22 (55%) requiring corticosteroids and 8 (20%) discontinuing CPI. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 6 (16%) of exacerbations and 13 (33%) of new irAEs. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Median follow-up was 15 months. For RCC, objective response rate (ORR) was 31% (95% CI 20% to 45%), median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7 months (95% CI 4 to 10) and 12-month overall survival (OS) was 78% (95% CI 63% to 87%). For UC, ORR was 40% (95% CI 26% to 55%), median TTF was 5.0 months (95% CI 2.3 to 9.0) and 12-month OS was 63% (95% CI 47% to 76%).

conclusionsPatients with RCC and UC with well-controlled AD can benefit from CPI with manageable toxicities that are consistent with what is expected of a non-AD population. Prospective study is warranted to comprehensively evaluate the benefits and safety of CPI in patients with AD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutoimmune DiseasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsInternational AgenciesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUrologic NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsautoimmunityimmunotherapykidney neoplasmsurologic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32217762
PMCPMC7174076
OpenAlexW3013567798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.