Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32217563›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Translation and cultural adaptation of a prostate cancer screening decision aid: a qualitative study in Portugal.

Sofia Baptista, Bruno Heleno, Marta Pinto, Bruna Guimarães, Diogo China, João Pedro Ramos, Andreia Teixeira, Kathryn L Taylor, Carlos Martins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sofia BaptistaDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal baptistas@med.up.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-9369
Bruno HelenoNOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Marta PintoCentre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Bruna GuimarãesSerpa Pinto Family Medicine Unit, Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde Porto Ocidental, Porto, Portugal.
Diogo ChinaSerpa Pinto Family Medicine Unit, Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde Porto Ocidental, Porto, Portugal.
João Pedro RamosDepartment of Psychology of deviance and justice, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andreia TeixeiraDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Kathryn L TaylorDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Carlos MartinsDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-5167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo translate and culturally adapt an English language patient decision aid addressing prostate cancer screening, so it can be used by Portuguese men.

designQualitative study. We followed the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control's (ECDC) five-step, stakeholder-based approach to adapting health communication materials: (1) selection of materials and process coordinators, (2) early review, (3) translation and back translation, (4) comprehension testing with cognitive semi-structured interviews and (5) proofreading. Content analysis was performed using Ligre software. SETTING AND

participantsCognitive interviews with 15 men to refine a decision aid after its translation. Eligible participants were Portuguese native-speaking men aged 55-69 years old recruited from the local community (urban and suburban) of Oporto district through advertisements in social media and senior universities between January and March 2019. A previous diagnosis of prostate cancer was the single exclusion criterion.

resultsFive main themes are presented: informational content, information comprehension, sociocultural appropriateness, feelings and main message and personal perspective concerning prostate cancer screening. Most men found the translated version of the decision aid to be clear, comprehensive and appropriate for its target population, although some suggested that medical terms could be a barrier. The data collected from men's interviews afforded the researchers the opportunity to clarify concepts and expand existing content.

conclusionsA decision aid was successfully translated and adapted to the Portuguese cultural setting. Our ECDC based approach can be replicated by other workgroups to translate and culturally adapt decision aids.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAgedCultural CharacteristicsDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPortugalProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsTranslationsProstate-Specific Antigendecision aiddecision makingearly detectionpatient participationprostate cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID32217563
PMCPMC7170593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.