Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32217282›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2020

Development of a new fully three-dimensional methodology for tumours delineation in functional images.

Albert Comelli, Samuel Bignardi, Alessandro Stefano, Giorgio Russo, Maria Gabriella Sabini, Massimo Ippolito, Anthony Yezzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Changes of [BMC medical imaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Artificial intelligence in molecular imaging.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Artificial intelligence for molecular neuroimaging.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Albert ComelliRi.MED Foundation, via Bandiera 11, 90133, Palermo, Italy.
Samuel BignardiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Alessandro StefanoInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Cefalù, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.stefano@ibfm.cnr.it.
Giorgio RussoInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Cefalù, Italy; Medical Physics Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Maria Gabriella SabiniMedical Physics Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Massimo IppolitoNuclear Medicine Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Anthony YezziDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.

Funding

Quantification of myocardial blood flow using Dynamic PET/CTA fused imagery to determine physiological significance of specific coronary lesionsR01HL143350 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PICCINELLI, MARINA · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delineation of tumours in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) plays a crucial role in accurate diagnosis and radiotherapy treatment planning. In this context, it is of outmost importance to devise efficient and operator-independent segmentation algorithms capable of reconstructing the tumour three-dimensional (3D) shape. In previous work, we proposed a system for 3D tumour delineation on PET data (expressed in terms of Standardized Uptake Value - SUV), based on a two-step approach. Step 1 identified the slice enclosing the maximum SUV and generated a rough contour surrounding it. Such contour was then used to initialize step 2, where the 3D shape of the tumour was obtained by separately segmenting 2D PET slices, leveraging the slice-by-slice marching approach. Additionally, we combined active contours and machine learning components to improve performance. Despite its success, the slice marching approach poses unnecessary limitations that are naturally removed by performing the segmentation directly in 3D. In this paper, we migrate our system into 3D. In particular, the segmentation in step 2 is now performed by evolving an active surface directly in the 3D space. The key points of such an advancement are that it performs the shape reconstruction on the whole stack of slices simultaneously, naturally leveraging cross-slice information that could not be exploited before. Additionally, it does not require any specific stopping condition, as the active surface naturally reaches a stable topology once convergence is achieved. Performance of this fully 3D approach is evaluated on the same dataset discussed in our previous work, which comprises fifty PET scans of lung, head and neck, and brain tumours. The results have confirmed that a benefit is indeed achieved in practice for all investigated anatomical districts, both quantitatively, through a set of commonly used quality indicators (dice similarity coefficient >87.66%, Hausdorff distance < 1.48 voxel and Mahalanobis distance < 0.82 voxel), and qualitatively in terms of Likert score (>3 in 54% of the tumours).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningPositron-Emission Tomography3D segmentationActive surfaceCancerMetabolic tumour volumePET imaging

Identifiers

PMID32217282
PMCPMC7237290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.