Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32217057›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2020

Height as a mediator of sex differences in cancer risk.

B C Fu, M Song, X Li, J Han, H O Adami, E L Giovannucci, L A Mucci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Body height and the excess cancer risk in men.International journal of cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Correcting for bias due to mismeasured exposure in mediation analysis with a survival outcome.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

B C FuDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA. Electronic address: benfu@hsph.harvard.edu.
M SongDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
X LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
J HanDepartment of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
H O AdamiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
E L GiovannucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
L A MucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TWOROGER, SHELLEY S · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health StudyUM1CA186107 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELIASSEN, A. HEATHER, STAMPFER, MEIR · 2014 to 2023
$22.3M
Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsU01CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Lorelei Mucci, Walter C. Willett · 2017 to 2026
$17.0M
Marine Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid, Gut Microbiome, and Colorectal Cancer PreventionR00CA215314 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SONG, MINGYANG · 2018 to 2020
$679k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS R00 CA215314NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001NCI NIH HHS U01 CA167552NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, age-standardized incidence rates for most cancers at shared sites are substantially and consistently higher in men than in women. Differences in established risk factors are unable to account for much of the sex disparity. We hypothesized that variability in height may be important in explaining sex differences in cancer risk. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included 49 372 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) and 115 612 women from the Nurses' Health Study (1980-2014). Height was reported at baseline and biennial questionnaires were used to collect information on cancer risk factors. We examined the association between sex and cancer incidence at shared anatomic sites using Cox proportional hazards models and performed mediation analysis to determine the percent of the association that was accounted for by height.

resultsOver up to 34 years of follow-up, 21 307 incident cases of cancers at shared sites (7705 men, 13 602 women) were documented. After adjusting for major cancer risk factors, men had a 39% increased risk of shared cancers overall (hazard ratio = 1.39; 95% confidence interval = 1.33-1.45) of which 35% (95% confidence interval = 24-46) was mediated by height. The excess risk of cancer for men was also partially explained by height for several specific cancers (gastrointestinal, melanoma, kidney, brain, hematologic). Mediation by height tended to be stronger among never smokers or those who adhered to a healthy lifestyle, and for cancers with fewer known environmental risk factors.

conclusionsDifferences in height among men and women partially mediated the association between sex and cancer incidence at several shared sites. Hence, mechanisms underlying the relationship between height and cancer may be important determinants of sex disparities in cancer incidence.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSex CharacteristicsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSex Factorscohort studyheightmediationsex

Identifiers

PMID32217057
PMCPMC7384254
OpenAlexW3013911427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.