Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32216789›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2020

Supervision as a tool for building surgical capacity of district hospitals: the case of Zambia.

Jakub Gajewski, Nasser Monzer, Chiara Pittalis, Leon Bijlmakers, Mweene Cheelo, John Kachimba, Ruairi Brugha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jakub GajewskiInstitute of Global Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. jakubgajewski@rcsi.ie.
Nasser MonzerDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Chiara PittalisDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Leon BijlmakersRadboud University Medical Centre Netherlands, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, Nijmegen, GA, Netherlands.
Mweene CheeloSurgical Society of Zambia, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
John KachimbaSurgical Society of Zambia, Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ruairi BrughaDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity Teaching Hospital · ZMRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany countries in sub-Saharan Africa have adopted task shifting of surgical responsibilities to non-physician clinicians (NPCs) as a solution to address workforce shortages. There is resistance to delegating surgical procedures to NPCs due to concerns about their surgical skills and lack of supervision systems to ensure safety and quality of care provided. This study aimed to explore the effects of a new supervision model implemented in Zambia to improve the delivery of health services by surgical NPCs working at district hospitals.

methodsTwenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with NPCs and medical doctors at nine district hospitals and with the surgical specialists who provided in-person and remote supervision over an average period of 15 months. Data were analysed using 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' thematic coding.

resultsInterviewees reported an improvement in the surgical skills and confidence of NPCs, as well as better teamwork. At the facility level, supervision led to an increase in the volume and range of surgical procedures done and helped to reduce unnecessary surgical referrals. The supervision also improved communication links by facilitating the establishment of a remote consultation network, which enabled specialists to provide real-time support to district NPCs in how to undertake particular surgical procedures and expert guidance on referral decisions. Despite these benefits, shortages of operating theatre support staff, lack of equipment and unreliable power supply impeded maximum utilisation of supervision.

conclusionThis supervision model demonstrated the additional role that specialist surgeons can play, bringing their expertise to rural populations, where such surgical competence would otherwise be unobtainable. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of the supervision model; the opportunity costs from surgical specialists being away from referral hospitals, providing supervision in districts; and the steps needed for regular district surgical supervision to become part of sustainable national programmes.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingClinical CompetenceCommunicationElectric Power SuppliesEquipment and SuppliesHealth PersonnelHospitals, DistrictHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchRural Health ServicesSurgical Procedures, OperativeTelemedicineZambiaGlobal surgeryMedical licentiatesNon-physician cliniciansTask shiftingZambia

Identifiers

PMID32216789
PMCPMC7098155
OpenAlexW3013859505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.