ArticleBMC health services research2020
Development and retention of the dental workforce: findings from a regional workforce survey and symposium in England.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2024Pooled it
- Dental Workforce Trends and Emerging Workforce Challenges: Perspectives from a 15-Year Longitudinal Analysis of the Israeli Experience (2008-2023).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the performance of an artificial intelligence model in recognizing the habitual mixed language in Taiwan for generating periodontal charting text reports.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Valuing and retaining the dental workforce: a mixed-methods exploration of workforce sustainability in the North East of England.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Current challenges of dental laboratory in Taiwan: The perspectives from a senior certified dental technician in a dental laboratory attached to a teaching hospital.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- The dental workforce recruitment and retention crisis in the UK.British dental journal · 2023Article
- Recruitment and retention in dentistry in the UK: a scoping review to explore the challenges across the UK, with a particular interest in rural and coastal areas.British dental journal · 2023Article
- Quality of Life and Satisfaction from Career and Work-Life Integration of Greek Dentists before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Improving the fit of filtering facepiece respirators.British dental journal · 2022Article
- The perceptions and attitudes of qualified dental therapists towards a diagnostic role in the provision of paediatric dental care.British dental journal · 2022Article
- Estimation of Factors Affecting Burnout in Greek Dentists before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Advertising and facial aesthetics in primary care: how compliant are practice websites and social media with published guidance?British dental journal · 2021Article
- A Nationwide Survey on Working Hours and Working Environment among Hospital Dentists in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo help promote a flexible and sustainable workforce in dentistry, it is necessary to access accurate and timely data about the structure and nature of the evolving dental team. This paper considers the results and learning from a region-wide dental workforce survey conducted in one area of Health Education England and how the team has changed since the last survey a decade earlier.
methodsA mixed-methods approach comprised two phases. In Phase 1 a customised workforce questionnaire was sent to all dental practices registered with the Care Quality Commission in the North East of England and North Cumbria in March 2016. Findings then informed Phase 2, a regional symposium held in October 2016, where interactive workshops generated qualitative data that elaborated on factors influencing workforce development.
resultsOf 431 primary dental care practices identified, 228 questionnaires were returned - a 53% response rate. The largest professional groups were dental nurses (n = 1269, 53% by headcount; 50% of fte) and dentists (34% by headcount; 42% by fte), though there had been increases in numbers of all staff groups over the decade, which was most marked for dental therapists (from 1 per 39 dentists to 1 per 8 dentists). The dental team predominantly fell into 'younger' age groups (< 46 years age), with evidence of a significant increase in the number of dentists reporting part-time working in a practice since the last survey. Around one third of dental practices reported employing dental nurses with additional skills (n = 74, 32.5%) or dental therapists (n = 73, 32%), and nearly half employed a dental hygienist (n = 104, 46%). However, there was considerable variability in whether these staff actually carried out the range of skills within their scope of practice. Factors shaping workforce development were identified as, the national context, loss of expertise, patients' health needs and expectations, surgery premises and financial constraints.
conclusionsThe composition and work patterns of the primary care dental workforce have changed markedly over the last decade, though utilisation of skill-mix continues to be constrained. Consideration of factors determining career progression of dentists and dental care professionals is needed to optimise a sustainable future workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.