Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32216762›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Group problem management plus (gPM+) in the treatment of common mental disorders in Syrian refugees in a Jordanian camp: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Aemal Akhtar, Luana Giardinelli, Ahmad Bawaneh, Manar Awwad, Hadeel Naser, Claire Whitney, Mark J D Jordans, Marit Sijbrandij, Richard A Bryant, STRENGTHS Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aemal AkhtarSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Luana GiardinelliJordan Country Office, International Medical Corps, Amman, Jordan.
Ahmad BawanehJordan Country Office, International Medical Corps, Amman, Jordan.
Manar AwwadJordan Country Office, International Medical Corps, Amman, Jordan.
Hadeel NaserJordan Country Office, International Medical Corps, Amman, Jordan.
Claire WhitneyInternational Medical Corps, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mark J D JordansResearch and Development Department, War Child Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marit SijbrandijClinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. r.bryant@unsw.edu.au.
STRENGTHS Consortium
King Hussein Medical Center · JOUNSW Sydney · AUWar Child · NL

Funding

Horizon 2020 733337National Health and Medical Research Council 1142605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccessing quality mental health care poses significant challenges for persons affected by adversity, especially in low- and middle-income countries where resources are scarce. To mitigate this, the World Health Organization has developed group problem management plus (gPM+), a low-intensity psychological intervention for adults experiencing psychological distress. gPM+ is a group-based intervention consisting of five-sessions, and can be delivered by non-specialist providers. This paper outlines the study protocol for a trial of gPM+ in Jordan.

methodsWe will conduct a single-blind, two-arm, randomized controlled trial in a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan. We aim to enrol 480 adults into the trial. Participants will be eligible for the trial if they screen positive for levels of psychological distress. Following screening, those eligible will be randomly assigned to receive the gPM+ intervention or enhanced treatment as usual. The primary outcome is reduction in levels of psychological distress at 3-months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include anxiety, depression, prodromal psychotic symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, prolonged grief, daily functioning, economic effectiveness, and change in parenting behaviour. Secondary outcomes also include the reduction in psychological distress of the participant's child. DISCUSSION: The trial aims to deliver a template for affordable and scalable psychosocial interventions that can readily be implemented in refugee settings, and that can benefit both the participant and their child.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001386123. Registered prospectively on 10/10/2019.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychological DistressPsychotherapy, GroupRefugee CampsRefugeesAdultFemaleHumansJordanMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSyriaTreatment OutcomeBehavioural interventionControlled trialMental healthPsychosocial interventionRefugees

Identifiers

PMID32216762
PMCPMC7098148
OpenAlexW3013537035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.