Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32216761›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Reduced bacterial contamination rates detected on silicone tourniquets compared to conventional tourniquets in clinical routine.

Marcus Grohmann, Lena Schomakers, Frank Wolschendorf, Janina Grosch, Susan Lindner, Anna Kristina Witte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcus GrohmannHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Lena SchomakersHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Frank WolschendorfHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Janina GroschHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Susan LindnerHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany.
Anna Kristina WitteHTK Hygiene Technologie Kompetenzzentrum GmbH, Heinrichsstr. 6, 96047, Bamberg, Germany. anna.witte@hygiene-tk.de.
Technologie- und Förderzentrum · DE

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft und Medien, Energie und Technologie Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTourniquets used for peripheral venous vascular access such as blood sampling are regularly contaminated in clinical routine. Although most contaminations are harmless, some pose a possible risk for infection. To improve peripheral venous access infection control standards, tourniquets with no or as few as possible bacterial burden should be used. Conventional tourniquets can be reprocessed by autoclaving or by incubating in disinfectants. However, both methods are time-consuming and not suitable for immediate use between patients. In contrast, silicone tourniquets can be quickly and simply reprocessed with wipe disinfection. In vitro studies from the manufacturer have demonstrated reduced bacterial contamination on silicone tourniquets after usage compared to conventional tourniquets. This study aims to independently investigate the bacterial load on both types of tourniquets in clinical routine.

methodsIn a first trial, new conventional and silicon tourniquets were used for blood sampling in one facility with strict guidelines for reprocessing (after each patient or not at all) for 1 day and tested for bacterial contamination. In a second trial, new tourniquets were used in four facilities while the mode and frequency of tourniquets' reprocessing was defined individually by each facility. The number of treated patients, mode and frequency of reprocessing and other relevant handling measures were documented.

resultsUnder controlled conditions, with strictly specified reprocessing, slightly fewer bacteria were found on silicone than on conventional tourniquets. In routine clinical practice the reprocessing frequency was not higher for silicone tourniquets in practice. Yet, in all four facilities, there were significantly fewer bacteria found on silicone than on conventional tourniquets.

conclusionAlthough tourniquets are classified as non-critical medical devices, results show - together with benefits of faster and easier reprocessing - that silicone tourniquets can improve infection control of venous vascular access.

Indexed as

SiliconesBacteriaBacterial LoadCross InfectionDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDisinfectantsDisinfectionEquipment ContaminationHumansTourniquetsDisinfectantsSiliconesBlood samplingContaminationHAI (hospital acquired infection)Infection controlPeripheral venous accessSilicone tourniquets

Identifiers

PMID32216761
PMCPMC7098146
OpenAlexW3013414292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.