Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32216614›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2020

Hemodynamic assessment of diastolic function for experimental models.

Leslie M Ogilvie, Brittany A Edgett, Jason S Huber, Mathew J Platt, Hermann J Eberl, Sohrab Lutchmedial, Keith R Brunt, Jeremy A Simpson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Guideline
  4. The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac function: a comparative echocardiography-conductance catheter study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leslie M OgilvieDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Brittany A EdgettDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8232-0432
Jason S HuberDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Mathew J PlattDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Hermann J EberlDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Sohrab LutchmedialDepartment of Pharmacology, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Keith R BruntDepartment of Pharmacology, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Jeremy A SimpsonDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the evaluation of cardiac function has focused on systolic function; however, there is a growing appreciation for the contribution of diastolic function to overall cardiac health. Given the emerging interest in evaluating diastolic function in all models of heart failure, there is a need for sensitivity, accuracy, and precision in the hemodynamic assessment of diastolic function. Hemodynamics measure cardiac pressures in vivo, offering a direct assessment of diastolic function. In this review, we summarize the underlying principles of diastolic function, dividing diastole into two phases:

Indexed as

Blood PressureDisease Models, AnimalPractice Guidelines as TopicVentricular FunctionAnimalsHeart FailureHeart Function TestscomplianceEDPguidelinesrespiratorytau

Identifiers

PMID32216614
PMCPMC7472516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.