ArticleCancer medicine2020
Validation of EORTC, CUETO, and EAU risk stratification in prediction of recurrence, progression, and death of patients with initially non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): A cohort analysis.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of smoking on recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Patients with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review on the Performance of Risk Stratification Models.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Pooled it
- Enhanced Visualization Methods for First Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour in Suspected Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2021Pooled it
- Computed tomography-derived extracellular volume fraction is associated with high-grade recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel.BJU international · 2026Article
- Article
- An explainable machine learning model for predicting bladder tumor aecurrence risk.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recurrence risk prediction for non-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma using diffusion and clinicopathology features.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Review
- Prognostic factors in T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with lymphovascular invasion: a retrospective cohort study.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Long-term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk-matched study.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Predicting Response to Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Pathology Assay: Development and Validation in an International 12-Center Cohort.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Molecular biomarkers of progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - beyond conventional risk stratification.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Diagnostic performance of Uromonitor and TERTpm ddPCR urine tests for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of immigration background on feasibility of electronic patient-reported outcomes in advanced urothelial cancer patients.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Article
- Comparison of staging MRI to re-resection for localised bladder cancer: Narrative review.BJUI compass · 2024Review
- Development and external validation of a model to predict recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel immunotherapeutic options for BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Review
- Preoperative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis as a predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a bi-institutional study.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Therapeutic strategies for asymptomatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
brief descriptionThe results demonstrate that the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scale provides the best recurrence and progression prediction in comparison with European Association of Urology (EAU) and Club Urologico Espanol de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) risk scores among a mixed population of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder who were treated with, or without, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and without any immediate postoperative chemotherapy. The study highlights the role of tumor diameter and extent in transition prediction. This retrospective cohort analysis of 322 patients with newly diagnosed non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) assesses the concordance and accuracy of predicting recurrence and progression by EAU-recommended tools (EAU risk groups, EORTC, and CUETO). One-year and five-year c-indices ranged from 0.55 to 0.66 for recurrence and from 0.72 to 0.82 for progression. AUCROC of predictions ranged from 0.46 for 1-year recurrence risk based on CUETO groups, to 0.82 for 1-year progression risk based on EAU risk groups. Diameter (HR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.39-2.61) and tumor extent (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01-1.46 for recurrence; HR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.40-6.87 for progression) were shown to be significant predictors in multistate analysis. Lower accuracy of prediction was observed for patients treated with BCG maintenance immunotherapy. The EORTC model (overall c-index c = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.61-0.68) was superior to the EAU (P = .035; .62; 95% CI: 0.59-0.66) and CUETO (P < .001; c = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.50-0.56) models in predicting recurrence. The EORTC model (c = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.77-0.86) also performed better than CUETO (P = .008; c = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.66-0.81) but there was no sufficient evidence that it performed better than EAU (P = .572; c = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.77-0.84) for predicting progression. EORTC and CUETO gave similar predictions for progression in BCG-treated EAU high-risk patients (P = .48). We share anonymized individual patient data. In conclusion, despite moderate accuracy, EORTC provided the best recurrence and progression prediction for a mixed population of patients treated with, or without BCG, and without immediate postoperative chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.