Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32215839›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2020

National Cross-Sectional Study of Community-Based Adverse Drug Reactions in Saudi Arabia.

Rasha A Almubark, Rawabi H Aljadani, Amani S Alqahtani, Thamir M Alshammari, Nasser F BinDhim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patterns of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rasha A AlmubarkSaudi Food and Drug Authority, 6336 Northern Ring Branch Rd, 3372, Riyadh, 13312 6336, Saudi Arabia. ralmubark@hotmail.com.
Rawabi H AljadaniSaudi Food and Drug Authority, 6336 Northern Ring Branch Rd, 3372, Riyadh, 13312 6336, Saudi Arabia.
Amani S AlqahtaniSaudi Food and Drug Authority, 6336 Northern Ring Branch Rd, 3372, Riyadh, 13312 6336, Saudi Arabia.
Thamir M AlshammariSaudi Food and Drug Authority, 6336 Northern Ring Branch Rd, 3372, Riyadh, 13312 6336, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser F BinDhimSaudi Food and Drug Authority, 6336 Northern Ring Branch Rd, 3372, Riyadh, 13312 6336, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn adverse drug reaction (ADR) is a response to a medicine that is not intended and is harmful, and which occurs at normal dose levels for humans. Currently, there are no estimates of the population-based prevalence of ADRs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

objectiveThe aims of this study were to (1) estimate the population-based prevalence of ADRs in KSA, (2) describe the ADRs experienced by survey respondents, and (3) investigate the level of awareness of the ADR reporting system. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey using stratified, population-based sampling conducted at a chain of community pharmacies.

resultsAnalysis was conducted on 5228 surveys; 50.17% of respondents were males, and the mean age was 39 ± 15 years (min = 18, max = 98). The sample prevalence of ADRs was 23.45% (95% CI 22.30-24.60%, P < 0.001). The estimated population prevalence (after weighting) was 28.00% (26.10-30.00%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most commonly reported ADRs (58.73%), followed by general disorders and administration site conditions (19.74%). The largest drug class that was reported to lead to ADRs was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (11%). Over 19% of the respondents who experienced an ADR required medical intervention to control the suffering induced by the ADR. Of the respondents who experienced an ADR, 371 (30.26%) were aware of the ADR reporting system but only 53 (14.29%) said that they had filed a report in the system.

conclusionsOur study estimated that 28% of the population experienced an ADR over a 1-year period in KSA. Risk factors for ADR included certain chronic disease groups and the use of certain classes of medications. Regulatory authorities in KSA intend to conduct more research and deploy educational interventions to reduce ADR rates in KSA. This will hopefully occur in an international context that promotes the standardized measurement of ADRs in the community. A subset of findings from this report was presented in an oral presentation at the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) Annual Conference, September 27, 2018. In addition, a subset of findings from this report were presented on a poster at the International Conference of Pharmacoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management (ICPE), August 27, 2019.

Identifiers

PMID32215839
PMCPMC7221044
OpenAlexW3012965153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.