Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020
Covariate adjusted reanalysis of the I-Preserve trial.
Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07429396 (Data-Driven Phenotyping in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Data-Driven Phenotyping in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum potassium and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a post-hoc analysis of the PARAGON-HF trial.European journal of heart failure · 2021Trial
- What Is the Current Best Drug Treatment for Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction? Review of the Totality of Evidence.American journal of hypertension · 2024Article
- Pathophysiological Rationale and Clinical Evidence for Neurohormonal Modulation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Cardiac failure review · 2023Review
- The four pillars of HFrEF therapy: is it time to treat heart failure regardless of ejection fraction?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Predicting treatment response in patients with HFpEF and myocardial fibrosis. Identifying useful tools with the help of CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Cellular and molecular pathobiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe CHARM-Preserved trial suggested that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor candesartan might have been beneficial in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, this hypothesis was not supported by the findings of I-Preserve with irbesartan.
aimsTo re-analyse the results of I-Preserve, adjusting for imbalances in baseline variables that may have influenced the trial outcomes.
methodsCox proportional hazards models with covariate adjustment for baseline variables, including age, sex, medical history, physiological and laboratory variables.
resultsIn I-Preserve, 763 (37.0%) participants in the placebo group and 742 (35.9%) in the irbesartan group experienced the primary composite outcome (death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arrhythmia, or stroke). The prespecified analysis of this outcome, stratifying for the use of ACEi at baseline, gave a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.05); p = 0.35. Adjusting the effect of treatment for key prognostic baseline variables, gave a HR of 0.89 (0.80-0.99); p = 0.033. Similar findings were observed for the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization.
conclusionAdjusting for imbalances in baseline variables that influence outcomes (or the response to therapy or both) can improve the power around the estimate of the effect of treatment and may alter its statistical significance. Along with the CHARM-Preserved results, these findings suggest that angiotensin-receptor blockers may have a modest effect in HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.