Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32215577›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ryan Phillips, William Yue Shi, Matthew Deek, Noura Radwan, Su Jin Lim, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Steven P Rowe, Ashley E Ross, Michael A Gorin, Curtiland Deville and 16 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 571 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
571citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
87.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02680587 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Randomized Observation Versus Stereotactic Ablative RadiatIOn for OLigometastatic Prostate CancEr (ORIOLE) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsRan2016 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsProstate Cancer, OligometastasesArmsSBRT
NCT05717660 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

APalutamide and stEReotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low Burden Metastatic Hormone senSItive Prostate Cancer, a rANdomized Trial - PERSIAN

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiRan2023 to 2025Enrolled180ConditionsOligometastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate CancerArmsSBRT on all sites of metastatic disease+Apalutamide
NCT06416436 phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Immunotherapy in Combination With Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra-high DoSes (ICARUS): A Phase I Dose-escalation Radiosurgery Study in Metastatic Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2024 to 2024Enrolled0ConditionsSolid TumorArmsAtezolizumab, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SBRT)
NCT07649421 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial of PSMA PET/CT-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With Darolutamide and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2026 to 2031Enrolled254ConditionsMetastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)ArmsStereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT), Darolutamide 600 mg twice daily, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

571 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,094 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Recommendations from the Galician Oncological Society and the Galician Society of Nuclear Medicine for the use ofClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Dosimetry Analysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  20. Trial

511 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan PhillipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
William Yue ShiStanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Matthew DeekDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noura RadwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Su Jin LimDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steven P RoweThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ashley E RossThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael A GorinThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Curtiland DevilleDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephen C GrecoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hailun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Samuel R DenmeadeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Channing J PallerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Shirl DipasqualeDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Theodore L DeWeeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel Y SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hao WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael A CarducciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth J PientaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin G PomperThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Adam P DickerSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mario A EisenbergerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ash A AlizadehStanford Cancer Institute, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Maximilian DiehnStanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Phuoc T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USStanford University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

A Genomic Framework for Molecular Risk Prediction & Individualized Lymphoma TherapyR01CA233975 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALIZADEH, ASH ARASH, DIEHN, MAXIMILIAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
PSMA Directed Imaging of Prostate Cancer Focus on Androgen Receptor DynamicsU01CA183031 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DEWEESE, THEODORE L, POMPER, MARTIN G · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233975NCI NIH HHS U01 CA183031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Complete metastatic ablation of oligometastatic prostate cancer may provide an alternative to early initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Objective: To determine if stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) improves oncologic outcomes in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (ORIOLE) phase 2 randomized study accrued participants from 3 US radiation treatment facilities affiliated with a university hospital from May 2016 to March 2018 with a data cutoff date of May 20, 2019, for analysis. Of 80 men screened, 54 men with recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and 1 to 3 metastases detectable by conventional imaging who had not received ADT within 6 months of enrollment or 3 or more years total were randomized. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive SABR or observation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was progression at 6 months by prostate-specific antigen level increase, progression detected by conventional imaging, symptomatic progression, ADT initiation for any reason, or death. Predefined secondary outcomes were toxic effects of SABR, local control at 6 months with SABR, progression-free survival, Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)-measured quality of life, and concordance between conventional imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography in the identification of metastatic disease. Results: In the 54 men randomized, the median (range) age was 68 (61-70) years for patients allocated to SABR and 68 (64-76) years for those allocated to observation. Progression at 6 months occurred in 7 of 36 patients (19%) receiving SABR and 11 of 18 patients (61%) undergoing observation (P = .005). Treatment with SABR improved median progression-free survival (not reached vs 5.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.81; P = .002). Total consolidation of PSMA radiotracer-avid disease decreased the risk of new lesions at 6 months (16% vs 63%; P = .006). No toxic effects of grade 3 or greater were observed. T-cell receptor sequencing identified significant increased clonotypic expansion following SABR and correlation between baseline clonality and progression with SABR only (0.082085 vs 0.026051; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with SABR for oligometastatic prostate cancer improved outcomes and was enhanced by total consolidation of disease identified by PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography. SABR induced a systemic immune response, and baseline immune phenotype and tumor mutation status may predict the benefit from SABR. These results underline the importance of prospective randomized investigation of the oligometastatic state with integrated imaging and biological correlates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02680587.

Indexed as

AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32215577
PMCPMC7225913
OpenAlexW3013251573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.