ArticleData in brief2020
Data on optimization of the non-linear Muskingum flood routing in Kardeh River using Goa algorithm.
Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes the time series data for optimizing the Non-linear Muskingum flood routing of the Kardeh River, located in Northeastern of Iran for a period of 2 days (from 27 April 1992 to 28 April 1992). The utilized time-series data included river inflow, Storage volume and river outflow. In this data article, a model based on the Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) was developed for the optimization of the Non-linear Muskingum flood routing model. The GOA algorithm was compared with other metaheuristic algorithms such as the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Harmony search (HS). The analysis showed that the best solutions achieved by the GOA, Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Harmony search (HS) were 3.53, 5.29, and 5.69, respectively. The analysis of these datasets revealed that the GOA algorithm was superior to GA and HS algorithms for the optimal flood routing river problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.