ArticleSustainability science2019
The good, the bad and the ugly: framing debates on nature in a One Health community.
Article in Sustainability science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Principlism: A Cosmopolitan and Care Ethics Approach to One Digital Health.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Rethinking One Health: Microbial Foundations for Ecological Governance.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- One Health Ethics and the Ethics of Zoonoses: A Silent Call for Global Action.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Uncovering associations between interest in One Health and pre-existing conditions and behaviours: Evidence from a UK survey.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- The New Precision Stewards?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Meanings and mechanisms of One Health partnerships: insights from a critical review of literature on cross-government collaborations.Health policy and planning · 2022Review
- Advancing sustainable development goals through immunization: a literature review.Globalization and health · 2021Review
- A Survey on One Health Perception and Experiences in Europe and Neighboring Areas.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Will the COVID-19 crisis trigger a One Health coming-of-age?The Lancet. Planetary health · 2020Article
- Reflecting on One Health in Action During the COVID-19 Response.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- "Health in" and "Health of" Social-Ecological Systems: A Practical Framework for the Management of Healthy and Resilient Agricultural and Natural Ecosystems.Frontiers in public healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Originating in medical and veterinary spheres, the One Health concept stands as an open call for collaboration also between these disciplines or professions and those of environmental and social science. However, the communities of practice in question show uneasy or under-developed collaborations, due to a variety of factors. We argue that an important factor is the way issues are raised and questions are formulated, i.e., their framing. Based on complementary perspectives on health and knowledge, this overview provides an inter- and trans-disciplinary analysis of the role of the framing of « nature » in One Health discourses as a barrier or a facilitator to collaboration, as revealed by the scientific literature. We find that the lack of reflection by scientists about the framing under which they operate appears as a major factor of misunderstanding between disciplines, and a barrier for inter- and trans-disciplinary solutions to improve management of health risks and benefits. Hence, to build such solutions, framing will have to be a conscious and repeated step in the process, acknowledging and explaining the diversity of viewpoints and values. The interdisciplinary dialogues inherent in this process promote translation between scientific domains, policy-makers and citizens, with a critical but pluralistic recourse to various framings of health risks and benefits associated with nature, and a deep awareness of their practical and ethical consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.