ArticleLanguage resources and evaluation2020
NorthEuraLex: a wide-coverage lexical database of Northern Eurasia.
Article in Language resources and evaluation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic similarity across languages reflects neurocognitive dimensions shaped by climate.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pathogen stress heightens sensorimotor dimensions in the human collective semantic space.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Lexibank 2: pre-computed features for large-scale lexical data.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Multiple evolutionary pressures shape identical consonant avoidance in the world's languages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- A Body Map Beyond Perceptual Experience.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Inference of partial colexifications from multilingual wordlists.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Tone and word length across languages.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Gaussian process models for geographic controls in phylogenetic trees.Open research Europe · 2023Article
- From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- CLARITY: comparing heterogeneous data using dissimilarity.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Exploring correlations in genetic and cultural variation across language families in northeast Asia.Science advances · 2021Article
- Preferred sound groups of vocal iconicity reflect evolutionary mechanisms of sound stability and first language acquisition: evidence from Eurasia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- TuLeD (Tupían lexical database): introducing a database of a South American language family.Language resources and evaluation · 2021Article
- Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.Nature human behaviour · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article describes the first release version of a new lexicostatistical database of Northern Eurasia, which includes Europe as the most well-researched linguistic area. Unlike in other areas of the world, where databases are restricted to covering a small number of concepts as far as possible based on often sparse documentation, good lexical resources providing wide coverage of the lexicon are available even for many smaller languages in our target area. This makes it possible to attain near-completeness for a substantial number of concepts. The resulting database provides a basis for rich benchmarks that can be used to test automated methods which aim to derive new knowledge about language history in underresearched areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.