ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2020
Association of
Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms markers for radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic evaluation of the association between a missense variant in XRCC3 gene splicing site and the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.Bioscience reports · 2023Pooled it
- Computational identification of rare pathogenic genomic variants in esophageal cancer markers: Transcript-level analysis, sequence-based insights, and structural-functional impacts of non-synonymous SNPs.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Molecular landscape of non-driver genes in myeloproliferative neoplasms through 333 cancer genes panel: Insights to reveal in Pakistan.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- A Case-Control Study on Combined Effects of Base Excision Repair and Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene Polymorphisms in Gastrointestinal Cancer Susceptibility.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Review
- Association of XRCC1 Gene Polymorphism with an Increased Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Peshawar Population.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Impact of Interaction between Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3 with Tumor Suppressor Tp53 Gene Increases Risk of Breast Cancer: A Hospital Based Case-Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Impact of Polymorphism in Base Excision Repair and Nucleotide Excision Repair Genes and Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Case-Control Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- The base excision repair process: comparison between higher and lower eukaryotes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Association of DNA Repair Genes XRCC1 and APE-1 with the Risk of Cervical Cancer in North Indian population.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe X-ray repair cross-complementing (
methodsThe present study included 497 subjects (213 EC patients and 284 healthy controls). The polymorphisms were screened using the PCR-RFLP method and allele and genotype distribution were compared using chi-square test. Association analysis was done by haplotype analysis and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis. Gene-gene interactions were identified using multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR). The risk was calculated using binary logistic regression.
resultsFor
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.