Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214821›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Frequency of Use, Perceptions and Barriers of Information and Communication Technologies Among Latin American Physicians: An Ecuadorian Cross-Sectional Study.

Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda, Emanuel Vanegas, Miguel Felix, Valeria L Mata, Fanny M Jiménez, Mabel Sanchez, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Sofia Cherrez, Antonio W D Gavilanes, Johannes Eschrich and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ivan Cherrez-OjedaUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1610-239X
Emanuel VanegasUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-8314-5595
Miguel FelixUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2243-3646
Valeria L MataUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.
Fanny M JiménezUniversidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.
Mabel SanchezUniversidad Laica Eloy Alfaro, Manabí, Ecuador.
Daniel Simancas-RacinesCentro De Investigación En Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica, Facultad De Ciencias De La Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3641-1501
Sofia CherrezSchool of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-7967
Antonio W D GavilanesDepartment of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Johannes EschrichRespira Lab Research Group, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Peter ChedrauiInstituto De Investigación e Innovación En Salud Integral, Facultad De Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Católica De Santiago De Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-3979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has increased in various sectors, among which the healthcare service is no exception. However, studies have mostly focused on the use of ICTs among patients with chronic diseases, with few reports on the advantages and barriers of these technologies among physicians, particularly in Latin America. We designed this study to fill in the gap, as an objective assessment of the frequency of use, perceptions, and barriers of ICTs among physicians remains crucial for a successful implementation of these technologies into the mainstream medical practice.

methodsWe conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey-based study in 640 Ecuadorian physicians. The survey used consisted of 13 items and evaluated the frequency of use, perceptions, and barriers of ICTs among physicians. Chi-square tests for goodness of fit and independence were performed, whilst Phi coefficient was interpreted to assess the strength of associations. Fisher exact test was performed when required.

resultsOver 90% of physicians reported the use of ICTs to message other colleagues and patients (p=0.000). While 89.5% of physicians used social media to interact with other colleagues, only 58.1% used them to interact with patients (p=0.000). Most participants reported the use of ICTs to search for academic information (p=0.000). Moreover, more than 80.0% agree that ICTs may be used to promote health and medical services, search new job opportunities, get involved in research projects and promote teamwork with colleagues. However, 83.6% of physicians expressed concerns about privacy and patient confidentiality, while 53.8% stated that they lacked the time to use ICTs.

conclusionHigh usage of ICTs was found among Ecuadorian physicians. Younger physicians, with less postgraduate years, and non-specialists were more likely to have a positive perception toward ICTs. Privacy and patient confidentiality, followed by time management, were the most reported barriers in our study.

Indexed as

eHealthmedical informaticspublic healthsocial mediaweb 2.0

Identifiers

PMID32214821
PMCPMC7082627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.